> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Kleine-König [mailto:u.kleine-koe...@pengutronix.de]
>
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 09:02:05AM +, PETER CHEN wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:13:01AM +, PETER CHEN wrote:
> > > > The current OC (Over Current) handling does not
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 09:02:05AM +, PETER CHEN wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:13:01AM +, PETER CHEN wrote:
> > > The current OC (Over Current) handling does not consider the default
> > > and bootloader OC setting well, in this commit, we reset OC setting
> > > according
>
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:13:01AM +, PETER CHEN wrote:
> > The current OC (Over Current) handling does not consider the default
> > and bootloader OC setting well, in this commit, we reset OC setting
> > according to dts value:
> > - If property "disable-over-current" is set, we will
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:13:01AM +, PETER CHEN wrote:
> The current OC (Over Current) handling does not consider the default
> and bootloader OC setting well, in this commit, we reset OC setting
> according to dts value:
> - If property "disable-over-current" is set, we will disable
The current OC (Over Current) handling does not consider the default
and bootloader OC setting well, in this commit, we reset OC setting
according to dts value:
- If property "disable-over-current" is set, we will disable OC at
code; otherwise, we will enable OC.
- Since most of USB power control
