On 06/11/2018 06:53 PM, Peter Chen wrote:
The port->logbuffer_head may be wrong if the two processes enters
_tcpm_log at the mostly same time. The 2nd process enters _tcpm_log
before the 1st process update the index, then the 2nd process will
not allocate logbuffer, when the 2nd process tries to
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:53:01AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> The port->logbuffer_head may be wrong if the two processes enters
> _tcpm_log at the mostly same time. The 2nd process enters _tcpm_log
> before the 1st process update the index, then the 2nd process will
> not allocate logbuffer, when
The port->logbuffer_head may be wrong if the two processes enters
_tcpm_log at the mostly same time. The 2nd process enters _tcpm_log
before the 1st process update the index, then the 2nd process will
not allocate logbuffer, when the 2nd process tries to use log buffer,
the index has already
