RE: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-06-05 Thread Du, Changbin
Thanks, Machek, This patch has already been dropped. > On Tue 2016-05-03 11:04:24, changbin...@intel.com wrote: > > From: "Du, Changbin" > > > > On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. > > In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's

Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-06-04 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2016-05-03 11:04:24, changbin...@intel.com wrote: > From: "Du, Changbin" > > On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. > In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the > name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'. And also we can change

Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-05-05 Thread Krzysztof Opasiak
On 05/06/2016 04:46 AM, Du, Changbin wrote: (...) >> Well, I'm not sure if any configfs interface has been proposed as easy >> to use from cmd line. I think they all has been proposed as *usable* >> from cmd line but not necessarily *easy to use*. >> >> That's why most of configfs clients has

RE: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-05-05 Thread Du, Changbin
> >>> On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. > >>> In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the > >>> name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'. > >> > >> Hmm libubsgx allows to do this for a very long time. You simply pass > >> NULL instead of pointer to

Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-05-05 Thread Krzysztof Opasiak
Hi, On 05/05/2016 07:46 AM, Du, Changbin wrote: > Hi, >>> On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. >>> In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the >>> name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'. >> >> Hmm libubsgx allows to do this for a very long time. You

RE: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-05-04 Thread Du, Changbin
Hi, > > On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. > > In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the > > name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'. > > Hmm libubsgx allows to do this for a very long time. You simply pass > NULL instead of pointer to usbg_udc. > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-05-04 Thread Krzysztof Opasiak
On 05/03/2016 05:04 AM, changbin...@intel.com wrote: > From: "Du, Changbin" > > On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. > In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the > name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'. Hmm libubsgx allows to

[PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-05-02 Thread changbin . du
From: "Du, Changbin" On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'. And also we can change UDC name at any time if it is not binded (no need set to ""