In current state I review all 3 patches as:
Rejected-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
[It breaks booting Nokia N900 device]
next step, figure why it's broken. Working just fine here
on AM335x which has the same musb IP.
Why is broken? That is
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:27:51AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
In current state I review all 3 patches as:
Rejected-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
[It breaks booting Nokia N900 device]
next step, figure why it's broken. Working just fine here
on
On Fri 2015-02-20 08:39:06, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:27:51AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
In current state I review all 3 patches as:
Rejected-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
[It breaks booting Nokia N900 device]
next step,
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 01:14:00AM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:15:52PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2015-02-20 08:39:06, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:27:51AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
In current state I review all 3 patches
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:15:52PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Fri 2015-02-20 08:39:06, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 09:27:51AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
In current state I review all 3 patches as:
Rejected-by: Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
On Thursday 05 February 2015 13:38:58 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:57:11 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:35:25 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:18:59 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:09:48AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Thursday 05 February 2015 13:38:58 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:57:11 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:35:25 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:57:11 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:35:25 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:18:59 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:17:28PM +0100, Pali Rohár
On Tue 2015-02-03 13:18:59, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:17:28PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 16:43:45 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 00:15:19 Felipe Balbi
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 00:15:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
f_phonet's -set_alt() method will call usb_ep_disable()
potentially on an endpoint which is already disabled. That's
something the gadget/function driver must guarantee that it's
always balanced.
In order to balance the calls, just
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 16:43:45 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 00:15:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
f_phonet's -set_alt() method will call usb_ep_disable()
potentially on an endpoint which is already
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 00:15:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
f_phonet's -set_alt() method will call usb_ep_disable()
potentially on an endpoint which is already disabled. That's
something the gadget/function driver must guarantee
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:17:28PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 16:43:45 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 00:15:19 Felipe Balbi wrote:
f_phonet's -set_alt() method will call
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:51:34 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:35:25PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:18:59 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:17:28PM +0100, Pali Rohár
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:18:59 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:17:28PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 16:43:45 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:31:51PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 00:15:19 Felipe
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 01:35:25PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:18:59 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:17:28PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 16:43:45 Felipe Balbi
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:57:11PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
f_phonet's -set_alt() method will call
usb_ep_disable() potentially on an endpoint which
is already disabled. That's something the
gadget/function driver must guarantee that it's
always
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:18:59 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:17:28PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 16:43:45 Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 04:31:51PM +0100,
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:35:25 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 08:27:52PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 20:18:59 Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 05:17:28PM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 03 February 2015 16:43:45 Felipe Balbi
f_phonet's -set_alt() method will call usb_ep_disable()
potentially on an endpoint which is already disabled. That's
something the gadget/function driver must guarantee that it's
always balanced.
In order to balance the calls, just make sure the endpoint
was enabled before by means of checking
20 matches
Mail list logo
