On Thu, 29 Nov 2012, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Is it safe to call urb_unlink_urb twice on the same urb? Or must I take
> care to not do that?
It is safe. You only have to make certain that the URB is not
deallocated before usb_unlink_urb returns.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: sen
+static void uas_unlink_data_urbs(struct uas_dev_info *devinfo,
+ struct uas_cmd_info *cmdinfo)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&devinfo->lock, flags);
+ if (cmdinfo->state & DATA_IN_URB_INFLIGHT) {
+ spin
On Thursday 29 November 2012 15:31:54 Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 11/29/12 14:20, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Thursday 29 November 2012 14:06:12 Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> Add uas_unlink_data_urbs function to cancel in-flight data urbs.
> >> Moves existing code into a separate function.
> >>
> >> Sign
On 11/29/12 14:20, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Thursday 29 November 2012 14:06:12 Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Add uas_unlink_data_urbs function to cancel in-flight data urbs.
>> Moves existing code into a separate function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 32 +
On Thursday 29 November 2012 14:06:12 Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Add uas_unlink_data_urbs function to cancel in-flight data urbs.
> Moves existing code into a separate function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
> ---
> drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 32 ++--
> 1 files chan
Add uas_unlink_data_urbs function to cancel in-flight data urbs.
Moves existing code into a separate function.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
---
drivers/usb/storage/uas.c | 32 ++--
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/
