Hi Afzal,
On 09/25/2012 10:47 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
This is a query regarding patch,
usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library [1]
It seems there is so far no consensus on this change.
After I have posted this patch, Kishon had posted a better solution [2].
We discussed the
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de wrote:
Hi Afzal,
On 09/25/2012 10:47 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
This is a query regarding patch,
usb: otg: add device tree support to otg library [1]
It seems there is so far no consensus on this change.
After I
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 16:21:39, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
wrote:
I'm interested in to get these patches into the kernel soon. Kishon any
news on this patch?
Something like this would be required for USB support
On 09/06/2012 05:27 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
We can use something like -phy as the phandle name. And the
users can get the phy by using
devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(dev, ).
(So the frwrk appends *-phy* to the name and searches). Or we don't
have any restriction on the phandle
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 09/04/2012 07:51 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
Since it's already a common function, we may give phandler
property
a common name too. So we will not need phandle argument.
Please also don't forget to document the
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 05:30:02PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 09/04/2012 07:51 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
Since it's already a common function, we may give phandler
property
a common name too. So we will not
Hi,
We should at least add Grant to the loop, I guess.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:46:13PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 05:30:02PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 09/04/2012 07:51 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON
On 09/06/2012 04:46 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
We should at least add Grant to the loop, I guess.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 10:46:13PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 05:30:02PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:32:06PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 08/29/2012 10:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
[...]
+struct usb_phy *devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
+const char *phandle)
Since it's already a common function, we may give phandler property
a common name too. So we will not need phandle argument.
Please also don't
On 09/04/2012 03:45 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 08/29/2012 10:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
[...]
+struct usb_phy *devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
+const char *phandle)
Since it's already a common
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:58:50PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 09/04/2012 03:45 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 12:31:14PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
On 08/29/2012 10:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
[...]
+struct usb_phy *devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(struct
On 09/04/2012 04:07 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
+struct usb_phy *devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
+const char *phandle)
Since it's already a common function, we may give phandler property
a common name too. So we will not need phandle argument.
Please also don't forget to
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On 09/04/2012 04:07 PM, Richard Zhao wrote:
+struct usb_phy *devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle(struct device *dev,
+const char *phandle)
Since it's already a common function, we may give phandler property
a
On 09/04/2012 07:51 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
Since it's already a common function, we may give phandler property
a common name too. So we will not need phandle argument.
Please also don't forget to document the devm_xxx and dt binding.
I don't think this is a good idea. If we hardcode
On 08/29/2012 05:14 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:43:11PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de
wrote:
On 08/24/2012 08:46 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
[...]
/**
+ * devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle -
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On 08/24/2012 08:46 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
[...]
/**
+ * devm_usb_get_phy_by_phandle - find the USB PHY by phandle
+ * @dev - device that requests this phy
+ * @phandle - name of the property holding the phy
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde m...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On 08/24/2012 08:46 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
Did you try both enableing and disabing DT pass build?
Impossible on mx28 :) The platform always selects USE_DT, but on imx it
builds without DT support.
On Thu,
On 08/24/2012 08:46 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
Did you try both enableing and disabing DT pass build?
Impossible on mx28 :) The platform always selects USE_DT, but on imx it
builds without DT support.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:22:53PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
From: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
18 matches
Mail list logo
