Re: [PATCH 75/82] usb: dwc3: gadget: wait for End Transfer to complete

Hi Feilpe, On 31 October 2016 at 18:55, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi Baolin, > > Felipe Balbi writes: >> From: Baolin Wang >> >> Instead of just delaying for 100us, we should >> actually wait for End Transfer

Re: [PATCH 75/82] usb: dwc3: gadget: wait for End Transfer to complete

Hi Baolin, Felipe Balbi writes: > From: Baolin Wang > > Instead of just delaying for 100us, we should > actually wait for End Transfer Command Complete > interrupt before moving on. Note that this should > only be done if we're dealing with

[PATCH 75/82] usb: dwc3: gadget: wait for End Transfer to complete

From: Baolin Wang Instead of just delaying for 100us, we should actually wait for End Transfer Command Complete interrupt before moving on. Note that this should only be done if we're dealing with one of the core revisions that actually require the interrupt before moving