On 2013年03月21日 02:28, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:18:03AM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
>> On 2013年03月20日 03:06, Sarah Sharp wrote:
>>> Ok, this looks sane, and our Intel testers report it doesn't oops like
>>> v2. The patch description on the first patch is better as well.
>>>
>>>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:28:41AM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:18:03AM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> > On 2013年03月20日 03:06, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > > Ok, this looks sane, and our Intel testers report it doesn't oops like
> > > v2. The patch description on the first patch is
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:18:03AM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> On 2013年03月20日 03:06, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> > Ok, this looks sane, and our Intel testers report it doesn't oops like
> > v2. The patch description on the first patch is better as well.
> >
> > Tianyu, I know this introduces a new API to
On 2013年03月20日 03:06, Sarah Sharp wrote:
> Ok, this looks sane, and our Intel testers report it doesn't oops like
> v2. The patch description on the first patch is better as well.
>
> Tianyu, I know this introduces a new API to the host controller driver
> structure, and we would normally queue t
Ok, this looks sane, and our Intel testers report it doesn't oops like
v2. The patch description on the first patch is better as well.
Tianyu, I know this introduces a new API to the host controller driver
structure, and we would normally queue these two patches for 3.10.
However, I know a lot o
This patch is to bind xhci root hub usb port with its acpi node.
The port num in the acpi table matches with the sequence in the xhci
extended capabilities table. So call usb_hcd_find_raw_port_number() to
transfer hub port num into raw port number which associates with
the sequence in the xhci exte
