Re: [PATCH v1] usb: dwc3: gadget: wait for End Transfer to complete

Hi, On 31 October 2016 at 20:53, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Baolin Wang writes: >> Instead of just delaying for 100us, we should >> actually wait for End Transfer Command Complete >> interrupt before moving on. Note that this should >> only be done

Re: [PATCH v1] usb: dwc3: gadget: wait for End Transfer to complete

Hi, Baolin Wang writes: > Instead of just delaying for 100us, we should > actually wait for End Transfer Command Complete > interrupt before moving on. Note that this should > only be done if we're dealing with one of the core > revisions that actually require the

[PATCH v1] usb: dwc3: gadget: wait for End Transfer to complete

Instead of just delaying for 100us, we should actually wait for End Transfer Command Complete interrupt before moving on. Note that this should only be done if we're dealing with one of the core revisions that actually require the interrupt before moving on. [ felipe.ba...@linux.intel.com: minor