On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:49:18AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2014 09:10 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:03:01PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
How about adding the change in attached patch [1] on top of this patch.
Just introduced the phy
Hi,
On Tuesday 18 November 2014 09:06 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:49:18AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2014 09:10 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:03:01PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
How about adding the change in
Hi,
On Tuesday 18 November 2014 09:06 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 10:49:18AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Monday 17 November 2014 09:10 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:03:01PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
How about adding the change in
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Heikki Krogerus
heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Hi Vivek,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:03:01PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Heikki, Kishon,
How about adding the change in attached patch [1] on top of this patch.
Just introduced the phy pointer in
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:03:01PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
How about adding the change in attached patch [1] on top of this patch.
Just introduced the phy pointer in phy_lookup structure, and
modified phy_find() accordingly.
I would be fine if we used the phy pointer to match, but if we
Hi,
On Monday 17 November 2014 09:10 PM, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:03:01PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
How about adding the change in attached patch [1] on top of this patch.
Just introduced the phy pointer in phy_lookup structure, and
modified phy_find() accordingly.
Hi Vivek,
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 07:03:01PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Heikki, Kishon,
How about adding the change in attached patch [1] on top of this patch.
Just introduced the phy pointer in phy_lookup structure, and
modified phy_find() accordingly.
[1] Attachment:
Hi Heikki, Kishon,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Vivek Gautam gautamvivek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Kishon,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 November 2014 02:07 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Kishon
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 31 October 2014 06:03 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Heikki,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Heikki Krogerus
heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Removes the need for the phys to be aware of their
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 November 2014 02:07 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 31 October 2014 06:03 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Heikki,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Heikki Krogerus
Hi Kishon,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 November 2014 02:07 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:12 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 31 October 2014 06:03 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 31 October 2014 06:03 PM, Vivek Gautam wrote:
Hi Heikki,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Heikki Krogerus
heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Removes the need for the phys to be aware of their users
even when not using DT. The method is copied from clkdev.c.
Hi Heikki,
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Heikki Krogerus
heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com wrote:
Removes the need for the phys to be aware of their users
even when not using DT. The method is copied from clkdev.c.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com
Tested-by:
Removes the need for the phys to be aware of their users
even when not using DT. The method is copied from clkdev.c.
Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus heikki.kroge...@linux.intel.com
Tested-by: Vivek Gautam gautam.vi...@samsung.com
---
Documentation/phy.txt | 66 ---
14 matches
Mail list logo