On 08/31/2016 01:24 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 12:48 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
>
>> Sure, but could you send me the cdc-acm.c file that this patch applies to?
>> Otherwise I need to patch it manually each time...
> Patch already applied.
>
> HTH
>
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 12:48 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
> Sure, but could you send me the cdc-acm.c file that this patch applies to?
> Otherwise I need to patch it manually each time...
Patch already applied.
HTH
Oliver
/*
* cdc-acm.c
*
* Copyright (c) 1999 Armin
On 08/31/2016 12:27 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 18:02 +, Binyamin Sharet (bsharet) wrote:
>
>> I think the reason is that in case of quirks == NO_UNION_NORMAL it gets the
>> data
>> and control interfaces and then jumps to skip_normal probe, in which case
>> there are no
On Fri, 2016-08-26 at 18:02 +, Binyamin Sharet (bsharet) wrote:
> I think the reason is that in case of quirks == NO_UNION_NORMAL it gets the
> data
> and control interfaces and then jumps to skip_normal probe, in which case
> there are no
> checks whether data_interface,
>
> On 26 Aug 2016, at 09:38, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Oliver,
>>
>> It will take me some time to test it on v4.4.6-v7, so I have tried applying
>> the patch
>> to v4.4 but it failed in the 4th hunk (line 47).
>>
>> Please advise, should I:
>>
>> - manually edit the
> Hi Oliver,
>
> It will take me some time to test it on v4.4.6-v7, so I have tried applying
> the patch
> to v4.4 but it failed in the 4th hunk (line 47).
>
> Please advise, should I:
>
> - manually edit the file on v4.4 and retest?
Please do that.
Regards
Oliver
> On 25 Aug 2016, at 17:24, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 13:53 +, Binyamin Sharet (bsharet) wrote:
>>>
>
>> It’s a good thing you asked, as I forgot to test this one…
>>
>> Just to be sure - which tag should I use for testing this one?
>> Is v4.4 OK?
>
On Thu, 2016-08-25 at 13:53 +, Binyamin Sharet (bsharet) wrote:
> >
> It’s a good thing you asked, as I forgot to test this one…
>
> Just to be sure - which tag should I use for testing this one?
> Is v4.4 OK?
Yes, perfect.
Thanks
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from
>
> On 25 Aug 2016, at 15:59, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 15:26 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 16:46 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
>>> Kernel version: raspberrypi 4.4.6-v7+ #871
>>> Driver source file: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
>>>
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 15:26 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 16:46 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
> > Kernel version: raspberrypi 4.4.6-v7+ #871
> > Driver source file: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
> > Umap2 command line: umap2vsscan -P -s 22b8:2d93
>
> Hi,
>
> could you retest
On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 10:11 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08/17/2016 04:26 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 16:46 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
> >> Kernel version: raspberrypi 4.4.6-v7+ #871
> >> Driver source file: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
> >> Umap2 command
Hi,
On 08/17/2016 04:26 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 16:46 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
>> Kernel version: raspberrypi 4.4.6-v7+ #871
>> Driver source file: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
>> Umap2 command line: umap2vsscan -P -s 22b8:2d93
> Hi,
>
> could you retest this kernel
On 08/17/2016 04:26 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 16:46 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
>> Kernel version: raspberrypi 4.4.6-v7+ #871
>> Driver source file: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
>> Umap2 command line: umap2vsscan -P -s 22b8:2d93
> Hi,
>
> could you retest this kernel with
On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 16:46 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
> Kernel version: raspberrypi 4.4.6-v7+ #871
> Driver source file: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
> Umap2 command line: umap2vsscan -P -s 22b8:2d93
Hi,
could you retest this kernel with the attached fix,
so I know whether it can go into
On 08/17/2016 01:18 PM, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
> On 08/17/2016 01:06 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 16:46 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
>>> Kernel version: raspberrypi 4.4.6-v7+ #871
>>> Driver source file: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
>>> Umap2 command line: umap2vsscan -P -s
On Wed, 2016-08-17 at 13:18 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
> I have retested this issue with ubuntu 16.04, using kernel 4.7-rc2
> and it was not reproduced.
Hi,
thanks a lot, that was most informative. I'll make a patch for the
stable series. The current fix cannot be backported.
Thanks
On 08/17/2016 01:06 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 16:46 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
>> Kernel version: raspberrypi 4.4.6-v7+ #871
>> Driver source file: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
>> Umap2 command line: umap2vsscan -P -s 22b8:2d93
>>
>> After connecting such a device, NULL
On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 16:46 +0300, Binyamin Sharet wrote:
> Kernel version: raspberrypi 4.4.6-v7+ #871
> Driver source file: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
> Umap2 command line: umap2vsscan -P -s 22b8:2d93
>
> After connecting such a device, NULL pointer dereference in the kernel
> and USB stops
Kernel version: raspberrypi 4.4.6-v7+ #871
Driver source file: drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c
Umap2 command line: umap2vsscan -P -s 22b8:2d93
After connecting such a device, NULL pointer dereference in the kernel
and USB stops responding.
Binyamin Sharet
Cisco, STARE-C
<< Attached:
19 matches
Mail list logo