Hi Pete.
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:07:42 +, Pete Batard wrote:
I, and many others, happen to think users of libusb deserve more than
one release in 4 years, even more so as continuous major development has
been going on.
I disagree.
If libusb works fine, no need to fix bugs that are not
Hi Jens,
On 2014.01.27 12:25, Jens Bauer wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jan 2014 17:07:42 +, Pete Batard wrote:
I, and many others, happen to think users of libusb deserve more than
one release in 4 years, even more so as continuous major development has
been going on.
I disagree.
If libusb works
Hi Pete.
What you are saying to me is meaningless.
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:59:22 +, Pete Batard wrote:
OK, so Peter's propaganda has worked.
Pete, you are young and have many good qualities. One of them is to analyze and
find errors.
But you have a problem. You feel attacked whenever
On 2014.01.27 20:44, Jens Bauer wrote:
Pete, you are young
Not a good start.
What if I told you I started programming in the mid 80s? Do I still qualify?
But you have a problem. You feel attacked whenever anyone says something that
you do not agree with.
Yes, I tend to be annoyed when
On 2014.01.26 07:47, Peter Stuge wrote:
I've removed the libusbx-devel list since Pete Batard banned[1] me
after I wrote that I considered the libusbx code to have a bug[2].
Here we go again. Well, we've been through that quite a few times already.
In the thread you pointed, I explained why
Hi,
It is my great pleasure to announce the release of libusb 1.0.18 (as
well as the simultaneous final release of libusbx 1.0.18), which marks
the long awaited merging back of libusbx with libusb!
With this release, we are finally consolidating the two projects back
into one, and bringing
Hi all,
I've removed the libusbx-devel list since Pete Batard banned[1] me
after I wrote that I considered the libusbx code to have a bug[2].
Pete Batard wrote:
It is my great pleasure
The hostile fork[3] is a success; you can now call libusbx libusb,
since Nathan Hjelm removed me from the
