RE: [PATCH v2] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2016-11-27 Thread Jerry Huang
ehresh <ramneek.mehr...@nxp.com>; julia.law...@lip6.fr; Sriram Dash <sriram.d...@nxp.com>; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697 On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Changming Huang wrote: > The EHCI specification

RE: [PATCH v2] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2016-11-27 Thread Jerry Huang
rd.edu; gre...@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Ramneek Mehresh <ramneek.mehr...@nxp.com>; julia.law...@lip6.fr; Sriram Dash <sriram.d...@nxp.com>; linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697 Hello. On 1

Re: [PATCH v2] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2016-11-25 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Changming Huang wrote: > The EHCI specification states the following in the SUSP bit description: > In the Suspend state, the port is senstive to resume detection. > Note that the bit status does not change untile the port is suspended and > that there may be a delay in

Re: [PATCH v2] fsl/usb: Workarourd for USB erratum-A005697

2016-11-25 Thread Sergei Shtylyov
Hello. On 11/25/2016 06:24 AM, Changming Huang wrote: The EHCI specification states the following in the SUSP bit description: In the Suspend state, the port is senstive to resume detection. Sensitive. Note that the bit status does not change untile the port is suspended and Until.