RE: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-11 Thread Peter Bestler
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:54:41AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 05:38:53PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: Hi, We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran the usb30cv test

Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-11 Thread Peter Chen
Hi, I tested your patch, Peter and it works fine. All tests of the usbcv30 are passing with my setup. Thank you so far. So you get a tested-by: peter.best...@omicron.at In my opinion we do it in the wrong order; we set the address before the status stage completes. But isn't the

Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-08 Thread Peter Chen
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: Hi, We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran the usb30cv test suite (version 1.0.1.2, chapter 9 tests for usb 2.0 devices) on win7 with g_zero and g_serial. We access the device via an usb 3.0 hcd

Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-08 Thread Felipe Balbi
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 05:38:53PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: Hi, We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran the usb30cv test suite (version 1.0.1.2, chapter 9 tests for usb 2.0 devices) on win7

Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-08 Thread Peter Chen
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 11:54:41AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 05:38:53PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote: On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: Hi, We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran the usb30cv test

Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-08 Thread Alexander Shishkin
Peter Chen peter.c...@freescale.com writes: On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: Hi, We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran the usb30cv test suite (version 1.0.1.2, chapter 9 tests for usb 2.0 devices) on win7 with g_zero and

Re: fsl_udc_core: set address request aren't handled like expected. usb30cv test suite fails.

2013-03-07 Thread Peter Chen
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:58:52AM +0100, Peter Bestler wrote: Hi, We try to get our device (based on p2020rdb) usb 2.0 compliant. We ran the usb30cv test suite (version 1.0.1.2, chapter 9 tests for usb 2.0 devices) on win7 with g_zero and g_serial. We access the device via an usb 3.0 hcd