Hi,
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 14:41 +0100, Kristian Evensen wrote:
>> I don't know which of the two behaviors (if any) are "correct" or what
>> the best way to solve this problem is. One options is to remove the
>> code from
On Tue, 2016-11-29 at 14:41 +0100, Kristian Evensen wrote:
> I don't know which of the two behaviors (if any) are "correct" or what
> the best way to solve this problem is. One options is to remove the
> code from the generic usbnet_cdc_status() function and move it to a
> ZTE-specific status
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Henning Schild
wrote:
> commit bfe9b9d2d introduced a workaround for link status detection.
> That workaround seems to cause a tight loop of usbnet_cdc_status being
> called all the time, which in turn prints
> "kevent 11 may have
Hi,
commit bfe9b9d2d introduced a workaround for link status detection.
That workaround seems to cause a tight loop of usbnet_cdc_status being
called all the time, which in turn prints
"kevent 11 may have been dropped" in the kernel log all the time.
I am not sure about the semantics, i just