Re: xhci regression for large transfers (commit e210c422b)

2016-01-07 Thread Ron
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 02:52:28AM +1030, Ron wrote: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 05:38:09PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: > > Hi > > > > On 02.01.2016 08:32, Ron wrote: > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >It appears the commit e210c422b6fdd2dc123bedc588f399aefd8bf9de > > >"xhci: don't finish a TD if we get a sh

Re: xhci regression for large transfers (commit e210c422b)

2016-01-07 Thread Ron
On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 05:38:09PM +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote: > Hi > > On 02.01.2016 08:32, Ron wrote: > > > >Hi, > > > >It appears the commit e210c422b6fdd2dc123bedc588f399aefd8bf9de > >"xhci: don't finish a TD if we get a short transfer event mid TD" > >is causing transfers larger than 16kB to

xhci regression for large transfers (commit e210c422b)

2016-01-01 Thread Ron
Hi, It appears the commit e210c422b6fdd2dc123bedc588f399aefd8bf9de "xhci: don't finish a TD if we get a short transfer event mid TD" is causing transfers larger than 16kB to be unreliable. I ran into this testing the code from here: http://www.bitbabbler.org which with a recent enough kernel and