Hi,
Felipe Balbi writes:
>> From: Felipe Balbi
>>> Sent: 07 April 2017 12:37
>>> Just like we did for all other endpoint types, let's rely on a chained
>>> TRB pointing to ep0_bounce_addr in order to align transfer size. This
>>> will make the code simpler.
>> ...
David Laight writes:
> From: Felipe Balbi
>> Sent: 07 April 2017 12:37
>> Just like we did for all other endpoint types, let's rely on a chained
>> TRB pointing to ep0_bounce_addr in order to align transfer size. This
>> will make the code simpler.
> ...
>
> Is the dwc3
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 08:51:13AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
>
> Please bear with me. I was out sick most of last week. till catching
Hope you are all well now :)
> Could you please pick this up.
>
> Acked-by: Shuah Khan
Thanks, Shuah.
Yuyang
--
To unsubscribe from
Hi Greg,
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 04:13:50PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Please send patches out, no need to wait, I'll just wait to apply them
> for the review, you can always build on top of previous series.
Got it. Thank you.
Yuyang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:52:51 +0200
> Hi Martin
>
>> @@ -2032,7 +2032,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *smsc95xx_tx_fixup(struct usbnet
>> *dev,
>> skb_push(skb, 4);
>> tx_cmd_b = (u32)(skb->len - 4);
>> if (csum)
>> -tx_cmd_b |=
Hi Mathias,
> From: Yoshihiro Shimoda, Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 7:03 PM
>
> This patch adds support suspend/resume for R-Car controllers.
> The controllers need firmware downloading and the current code has
> such process only when probe timing. After suspend the system and
> the power of
On 04/11/2017 09:31 AM, John Youn wrote:
> On 04/11/2017 12:45 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> John Youn writes:
Thinh Nguyen writes:
> The dwc3 driver can overwite its previous events if its top half IRQ
> handler gets
On 4/11/2017 12:36 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Thinh Nguyen writes:
Felipe Balbi writes:
Thinh Nguyen writes:
This patch fixes a commit that causes a hang from device waiting for
data with the wrong sequence number.
On 4/11/2017 7:35 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
To fix this problem, both the smp_rmb() in sleep_thread() and the
smp_wmb() in wakeup_thread() should be changed to smp_mb().
Wouldn't it be sufficient to have smp_mb() just either in the
sleep_thread() or the
Hello Guoqing Zhang,
The patch a6ff6cbf1fab: "usb: xhci: Add helper function
xhci_set_power_on()." from Apr 7, 2017, leads to the following static
checker warning:
drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c:575 xhci_set_port_power()
error: calling 'spin_unlock_irqrestore()' with bogus flags
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:58:40 +0200
Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> Nope, they don't apply to my tree, it was probably based on yours. And
> the first two are ones I shouldn't be taking.
>
> So, feel free to take all of these with a:
> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:36:39PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:58:40 +0200
> Greg Kroah-Hartman escreveu:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 10:04:33PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 11:23:28AM -0600,
Em Tue, 11 Apr 2017 16:58:40 +0200
Greg Kroah-Hartman escreveu:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 10:04:33PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 11:23:28AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:22:54 -0300
> > > Mauro Carvalho
Hi Niranjan,
[auto build test ERROR on usb/usb-testing]
[also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc6]
[cannot apply to next-20170411]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Niranjan-Dighe
Hi Niranjan,
[auto build test ERROR on usb/usb-testing]
[also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc6]
[cannot apply to next-20170411]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Niranjan-Dighe
On 04/11/2017 12:45 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> John Youn writes:
>>> Thinh Nguyen writes:
The dwc3 driver can overwite its previous events if its top half IRQ
handler gets invoked again before processing the events in the
From: Felipe Balbi
> Sent: 07 April 2017 12:37
> Just like we did for all other endpoint types, let's rely on a chained
> TRB pointing to ep0_bounce_addr in order to align transfer size. This
> will make the code simpler.
...
Is the dwc3 similar enough to xhci to have an 'immediate data' bit?
If
On 04/10/2017 11:58 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> John Youn writes:
Yes it will re-assert. The interrupt line will remain asserted as long
events remain in the buffer and it is not masked. So when we
eventually unmask, the interrupt will be reasserted
Currently usb_gadget_connect() is called only through gadget
registration via composite_driver_probe(). As a result, after a
disconnection, if the role transitions to host and back to gadget,
the gadget is not recognized by the host anymore.
This is a typical scenario with an iAP device in the
On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 10:04:33PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 08, 2017 at 11:23:28AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> > On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 10:22:54 -0300
> > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> >
> > > Currently, there are several USB core documents that
On 04/10/2017 04:38 PM, Yuyang Du wrote:
> Hi Shuah,
>
> Could you please take a look at these patches? I got more patches
> that sit on these to send out.
Please bear with me. I was out sick most of last week. Still catching
up. Go ahead and send the patches, no need to wait.
>
> Thanks,
>
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 11:13:55AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> here's my pull request for v4.12 merge window. Changes have been tested
> for Intel Edison where applicable. They have also been soaking for
> linux-next for a while. Let me know if you want anything to be changed.
>
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017, Thinh Nguyen wrote:
> To fix this problem, both the smp_rmb() in sleep_thread() and the
> smp_wmb() in wakeup_thread() should be changed to smp_mb().
>
> Wouldn't it be sufficient to have smp_mb() just either in the
> sleep_thread() or the wakeup_thread() in this
On 04/11/2017 04:13 PM, Rolf Evers-Fischer wrote:
Hi,
Christian Gromm writes:
we observe an issue with a td_list running empty and an
endpoint being stalled at the same time on
Linux ihu-low 4.1.27-abl #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 20 13:51:51 CET 2017
x86_64 x86_64
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:12:01AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>
> > > Oddly enough, yes. But it doesn't explain why this code doesn't blow
> > > up every time it gets called, in its current form.
> >
> > Well, it does :-)
> >
> > dev_get_drvdata(_dev)
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at
Hi,
Christian Gromm writes:
> we observe an issue with a td_list running empty and an
> endpoint being stalled at the same time on
>
> Linux ihu-low 4.1.27-abl #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 20 13:51:51 CET 2017
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux.
we've recently observed
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Oddly enough, yes. But it doesn't explain why this code doesn't blow
> > up every time it gets called, in its current form.
>
> Well, it does :-)
>
> dev_get_drvdata(_dev) -> NULL -> kfree(NULL)
>
> We're just leaking memory. I guess a patch like
Am Freitag, den 07.04.2017, 10:17 +0200 schrieb Tobias Klauser:
> Instead of using a private copy of struct net_device_stats in struct
> kaweth_device, use stats from struct net_device. Also remove the now
> unnecessary .ndo_get_stats function.
>
> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by:
On 17-04-07 10:17:39, Tobias Klauser wrote:
> Instead of using a private copy of struct net_device_stats in struct pegasus,
> use stats from struct net_device. Also remove the now unnecessary
> .ndo_get_stats function.
Looks OK to me.
Petko
> Cc: Petko Manolov
Hi Greg,
here's my pull request for v4.12 merge window. Changes have been tested
for Intel Edison where applicable. They have also been soaking for
linux-next for a while. Let me know if you want anything to be changed.
There will be a conflict on
drivers/usb/gadget/udc/{Kconfig,amd5536udc.c}
Hi,
John Youn writes:
>> Thinh Nguyen writes:
>>> The dwc3 driver can overwite its previous events if its top half IRQ
>>> handler gets invoked again before processing the events in the cache. We
>>
>> interrupts are masked, why would top half
Hi,
Alan Stern writes:
> Felipe, was this patch meant to solve the problem you encountered in
> your "Memory barrier needed with wake_up_process()?" email thread last
> fall?
it certainly smells like it, but Thinh Nguyen didn't say for sure :-)
--
balbi
Hi,
Thinh Nguyen writes:
>> Felipe Balbi writes:
>>> Thinh Nguyen writes:
This patch fixes a commit that causes a hang from device waiting for
data with the wrong sequence number. The commit ffb80fc672c3 ("usb:
Hi,
Alan Stern writes:
>> >> >> >> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c
>> >> >> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/core.c
>> >> >> >> @@ -1273,6 +1273,7 @@ void usb_del_gadget_udc(struct usb_gadget
>> >> >> >> *gadget)
>> >> >> >> flush_work(>work);
>> >> >> >>
Hi,
John Youn writes:
>>> Yes it will re-assert. The interrupt line will remain asserted as long
>>> events remain in the buffer and it is not masked. So when we
>>> eventually unmask, the interrupt will be reasserted again immediately.
>>>
BTW, other option here
Hi Shuah,
Could you please take a look at these patches? I got more patches
that sit on these to send out.
Thanks,
Yuyang
On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 06:03:24AM +0800, Yuyang Du wrote:
> If we get nonpositive number of ports, there is no sense to
> continue, then fail gracefully.
>
> In addition,
On 04/10/2017 11:17 PM, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
> On 10 April 2017 at 20:43, John Youn wrote:
>> On 04/08/2017 12:38 PM, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
>>> 2017-04-08 1:57 GMT+02:00 Thinh Nguyen :
The dwc3 driver can overwite its previous events if
On 10 April 2017 at 20:43, John Youn wrote:
> On 04/08/2017 12:38 PM, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
>> 2017-04-08 1:57 GMT+02:00 Thinh Nguyen :
>>> The dwc3 driver can overwite its previous events if its top half IRQ
>>> handler gets invoked again
39 matches
Mail list logo