(2012/10/17 0:59), Ming Lei wrote:
> This patch introduces PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO on process flag('flags' field of
> 'struct task_struct'), so that the flag can be set by one task
> to avoid doing I/O inside memory allocation in the task's context.
> 
> The patch trys to solve one deadlock problem caused by block device,
> and the problem may happen at least in the below situations:
> 
> - during block device runtime resume, if memory allocation with
> GFP_KERNEL is called inside runtime resume callback of any one
> of its ancestors(or the block device itself), the deadlock may be
> triggered inside the memory allocation since it might not complete
> until the block device becomes active and the involed page I/O finishes.
> The situation is pointed out first by Alan Stern. It is not a good
> approach to convert all GFP_KERNEL in the path into GFP_NOIO because
> several subsystems may be involved(for example, PCI, USB and SCSI may
> be involved for usb mass stoarage device)
> 
> - during error handling of usb mass storage deivce, USB bus reset
> will be put on the device, so there shouldn't have any
> memory allocation with GFP_KERNEL during USB bus reset, otherwise
> the deadlock similar with above may be triggered. Unfortunately, any
> usb device may include one mass storage interface in theory, so it
> requires all usb interface drivers to handle the situation. In fact,
> most usb drivers don't know how to handle bus reset on the device
> and don't provide .pre_set() and .post_reset() callback at all, so
> USB core has to unbind and bind driver for these devices. So it
> is still not practical to resort to GFP_NOIO for solving the problem.
> 
> Also the introduced solution can be used by block subsystem or block
> drivers too, for example, set the PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO flag before doing
> actual I/O transfer.
> 
> Cc: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
> Cc: Oliver Neukum <oneu...@suse.de>
> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jiri.kos...@suse.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <m...@csn.ul.ie>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.cz>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <r...@sisk.pl>
> Cc: linux-mm <linux...@kvack.org>
> Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minc...@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming....@canonical.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/sched.h |   11 +++++++++++
>   mm/page_alloc.c       |   10 +++++++++-
>   mm/vmscan.c           |   13 +++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index f6961c9..c149ae7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1811,6 +1811,7 @@ extern void thread_group_times(struct task_struct *p, 
> cputime_t *ut, cputime_t *
>   #define PF_FROZEN   0x00010000      /* frozen for system suspend */
>   #define PF_FSTRANS  0x00020000      /* inside a filesystem transaction */
>   #define PF_KSWAPD   0x00040000      /* I am kswapd */
> +#define PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO 0x00080000  /* Allocating memory without IO 
> involved */
>   #define PF_LESS_THROTTLE 0x00100000 /* Throttle me less: I clean memory */
>   #define PF_KTHREAD  0x00200000      /* I am a kernel thread */
>   #define PF_RANDOMIZE        0x00400000      /* randomize virtual address 
> space */
> @@ -1848,6 +1849,16 @@ extern void thread_group_times(struct task_struct *p, 
> cputime_t *ut, cputime_t *
>   #define tsk_used_math(p) ((p)->flags & PF_USED_MATH)
>   #define used_math() tsk_used_math(current)
>   
> +#define memalloc_noio() (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO)
> +#define memalloc_noio_save(noio_flag) do { \
> +     (noio_flag) = current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO; \
> +     current->flags |= PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO; \
> +} while (0)
> +#define memalloc_noio_restore(noio_flag) do { \
> +     if (!(noio_flag)) \
> +             current->flags &= ~PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO; \
> +} while (0)
> +
>   /*
>    * task->jobctl flags
>    */
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 8e1be1c..e3746dd 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2630,10 +2630,18 @@ retry_cpuset:
>       page = get_page_from_freelist(gfp_mask|__GFP_HARDWALL, nodemask, order,
>                       zonelist, high_zoneidx, alloc_flags,
>                       preferred_zone, migratetype);
> -     if (unlikely(!page))
> +     if (unlikely(!page)) {
> +             /*
> +              * Resume, block IO and its error handling path
> +              * can deadlock because I/O on the device might not
> +              * complete.
> +              */
> +             if (unlikely(memalloc_noio()))
> +                     gfp_mask &= ~GFP_IOFS;
>               page = __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_mask, order,
>                               zonelist, high_zoneidx, nodemask,
>                               preferred_zone, migratetype);
> +     }
>   
>       trace_mm_page_alloc(page, order, gfp_mask, migratetype);
>   
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 1e9aa66..6647805 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -3298,6 +3298,19 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t 
> gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
>       };
>       unsigned long nr_slab_pages0, nr_slab_pages1;
>   
> +     if (unlikely(memalloc_noio())) {
> +             sc.gfp_mask &= ~GFP_IOFS;
> +             shrink.gfp_mask = sc.gfp_mask;
> +             /*
> +              * We allow to reclaim only clean pages.
> +              * It can affect RECLAIM_SWAP and RECLAIM_WRITE mode
> +              * but this is really rare event and allocator can
> +              * fallback to other zones.
> +              */
> +             sc.may_writepage = 0;
> +             sc.may_swap = 0;

I think the idea is reasonable. I have a request.

In current implemententation of vmscan.c, it seems sc.may_writepage, sc.may_swap
are handled independent from gfp_mask. 

So, could you drop changes from this patch and handle these flags in another 
patch
if these flags should be unset if ~GFP_IOFS ?

I think try_to_free_page() path's sc.may_xxxx should be handled in the same way.

Thanks,
-Kame





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to