Agreed. Please move this to the libusbx mailing list. I couldn't care less 
about libusbx after the hid fiasco.

-Nathan

On Sep 24, 2012, at 9:42 PM, Jure Menart <jure.men...@espros.ch> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
> 
> I'd like to share one unrelated thing: I AM NOT subscribed to the libusbx 
> related mailing lists and I AM NOT using it in my current development.
> 
> I do appreciate the effort of all libusbx developers and I support them in 
> their decisions. I hope once I will contribute something to it... but at this 
> moment in time - I am subscribed to libusb development mailing list. Why I 
> have to read about (IMHO quite childish) problems of a fork of libusb?
> 
> I like how reasonable Pete and Hands are handling this so congratulations to 
> them. But can you please remove 'old non-friendly libusb' thing from your 
> CC's. Each maintainer/developer who will or would like to support libusb and 
> libusbx should follow their thread and complain at their mailing list.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Jure Menart
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg KH" <g...@kroah.com>
> To: "Kustaa Nyholm" <kustaa.nyh...@planmeca.com>
> Cc: libusb-de...@lists.sourceforge.net, libusbx-de...@lists.sourceforge.net, 
> linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, libusb-win32-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Sent: Monday, 24 September, 2012 9:31:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [Libusbx-devel] libusbx-1.0.13 has been released
> 
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 10:16:25PM +0300, Kustaa Nyholm wrote:
>> On 24.9.2012 21.47, "Greg KH" <g...@kroah.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> And if I'm going to be forced to change my program, and libusbx has now
>>> shown that they don't care about their public api, well, I might as well
>>> just rewrite it to remove that dependancy completly, as it's obvious
>>> they don't know how to treat their users.
>> 
>> Really Greg,
>> 
>> I think you are overreacting and talking through your hat.
>> 
>> If you bothered to check the archives you'd see how much the developers
>> actually care about their users.
> 
> Um, breaking existing applications is not indicative of that, don't you
> agree?
> 
>> If you think rewriting to remove that dependency makes more sense
>> than applying a trivial fix Pete promised to deliver, go ahead,
>> especially if you think that is what *your* users will want.
> 
> No one delivered any such "fix", all I got was a bunch of bug reports
> this morning from the distros saying that usbutils was suddenly broken.
> That shows that libusbx is really the problem here, and that maybe I
> shouldn't depend on it anymore.
> 
> greg k-h
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> libusb-devel mailing list
> libusb-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-devel
> 
> 
> --- Disclaimer: --- 
> This email and contents is for use only by the intended recipient. If you are 
> not the individual or entity to whom it is addressed, you are hereby formally 
> notified that any use, copying or distribution of this email and attachments, 
> in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email 
> in error, please notify the sender and delete the message and attachment(s) 
> from your system. Any views, opinions or information, expressed or contained 
> in this email, are those of the sender and not necessarily reflect those of 
> ESPROS Photonics AG. To help protect our environment, please avoid printing 
> out this information unnecessarily.
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> libusb-devel mailing list
> libusb-de...@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusb-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to