Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures

On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 03:42:25 PDT (-0700), Arnd Bergmann wrote: On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: On 03/15/2018 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote: Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU? RISC-V ? (evil grin :-) Is anyone producing a chip that

Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures

Hi, On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:56:48AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote: > > Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU? Please don't kill !MMU. > Yes, plenty. > I've made an overview of the remaining

Re: rfc: remove print_vma_addr ? (was Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures)

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 10:08 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > I have a patchset that creates a vsprintf extension for > > print_vma_addr and removes all the uses similar to the > > print_symbol() removal. > > > > This now avoids any

Re: rfc: remove print_vma_addr ? (was Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures)

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 09:56:46AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > I have a patchset that creates a vsprintf extension for > print_vma_addr and removes all the uses similar to the > print_symbol() removal. > > This now avoids any possible printk interleaving. > > Unfortunately, without some #ifdef

rfc: remove print_vma_addr ? (was Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures)

On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 10:48 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi David, > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote: > > Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU? > > Sure: arm, c6x, m68k, microblaze, and sh. I have a patchset that creates a

Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 11:42:25AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Is anyone producing a chip that includes enough of the Privileged ISA spec > to have things like system calls, but not the MMU parts? Various SiFive SOCs seem to support M and U mode, but no S mode or iommu. That should be enough

Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 03/15/2018 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote: >> Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU? >> > RISC-V ? > (evil grin :-) Is anyone producing a chip that includes enough of the Privileged ISA spec to have things

Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures

On 03/15/2018 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote: > Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU? > RISC-V ? (evil grin :-) Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes ReineckeTeamlead Storage & Networking h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH,

Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures

On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote: > Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU? Yes, plenty. I was wondering the same thing, but it seems that the architectures we remove are almost completely representative of what we support overall, except

Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures

Hi David, On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 10:42 AM, David Howells wrote: > Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU? Sure: arm, c6x, m68k, microblaze, and sh. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32

Re: [PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures

Do we have anything left that still implements NOMMU? David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH 00/16] remove eight obsolete architectures

Here is the collection of patches I have applied to my 'asm-generic' tree on top of the 'metag' removal. This does not include any of the device drivers, I'll send those separately to a someone different list of people. The removal came out of a discussion that is now documented at