On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:55 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Octavian Purdila
octavian.purd...@intel.com wrote:
As noticed during suspend/resume operations,
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Octavian Purdila
octavian.purd...@intel.com wrote:
As noticed during suspend/resume operations, the IRQ can be unmasked
then disabled in suspend and eventually enabled in resume,
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Octavian Purdila
octavian.purd...@intel.com wrote:
As noticed during suspend/resume operations, the IRQ can be unmasked
then disabled in suspend and eventually enabled in resume, but without
being unmasked.
The current implementation does not take into
As noticed during suspend/resume operations, the IRQ can be unmasked
then disabled in suspend and eventually enabled in resume, but without
being unmasked.
The current implementation does not take into account interactions
between mask/unmask and enable/disable interrupts, and thus in the
above
