On 09/09/2014 05:27 PM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
On 09/03/2014 10:51 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
Mathias,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Andrew Bresticker
abres...@chromium.org wrote:
It was suggested in the review of the Tegra xHCI driver [1] that we
allow xHCI drivers to be built as
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:31:03PM +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
On 09/09/2014 05:27 PM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
On 09/03/2014 10:51 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
Mathias,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Andrew Bresticker
abres...@chromium.org wrote:
It was suggested in the review of the
On 09/03/2014 10:51 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote:
Mathias,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Andrew Bresticker
abres...@chromium.org wrote:
It was suggested in the review of the Tegra xHCI driver [1] that we
allow xHCI drivers to be built as individual modules (like EHCI) instead
of
Mathias,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:01 AM, Andrew Bresticker
abres...@chromium.org wrote:
It was suggested in the review of the Tegra xHCI driver [1] that we
allow xHCI drivers to be built as individual modules (like EHCI) instead
of building them all into the single xhci-hcd module as they
It was suggested in the review of the Tegra xHCI driver [1] that we
allow xHCI drivers to be built as individual modules (like EHCI) instead
of building them all into the single xhci-hcd module as they are today.
Patches 1-3 prepare for making the xHCI PCI and platform drivers able
to be built as
