> Why isn't this in the changelog itself? But more importantly, I don't see
> how this patch makes your "goal" implemented...
Sorry.
I think almost same thing is in cover letter but version info is getting long.
Anyway I will improve the log.
> Anyway, please break this all up into smaller,
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 04:21:59AM +, fx IWATA NOBUO wrote:
> > I don't see any benifit here at all, please explain it better.
> > You are saying what your patch does, but not why we would want it.
>
> It may not be better than cover letter but I try.
>
> My use case is
> a) a service in
> I don't see any benifit here at all, please explain it better.
> You are saying what your patch does, but not why we would want it.
It may not be better than cover letter but I try.
My use case is
a) a service in internet with VHCI
b) distributed small Linux nodes with STUB and IoT devices.
> That's too much code to review, especially for something that I have no
> idea what it is, or why it is needed at all.
>
> Please be more descriptive here, and hopefully, break this patch down into
> smaller steps.
OK. I will divide.
Best Regards,
n.iwata
//
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:45:01AM +0900, Nobuo Iwata wrote:
> USB/IP supports a function to import USB devices from application-side
> machine by attach command.
> The usage is as following.
> dev:# (Physically attach your USB device.)
> dev:# insmod usbip-core.ko and usbip-host.ko
> dev:#
USB/IP supports a function to import USB devices from application-side
machine by attach command.
The usage is as following.
dev:# (Physically attach your USB device.)
dev:# insmod usbip-core.ko and usbip-host.ko
dev:# usbipd -D
// Start usbip daemon.
dev:# usbip list -l
// List local USB devices
