On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:04:24PM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 01:36:09PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:16:55PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > The USB Type-C class is meant to provide unified interface to the
> > > userspace to present
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 01:36:09PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:16:55PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > The USB Type-C class is meant to provide unified interface to the
> > userspace to present the USB Type-C ports in a system.
> >
> Any idea what is happening with
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 02:16:55PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> The USB Type-C class is meant to provide unified interface to the
> userspace to present the USB Type-C ports in a system.
>
Any idea what is happening with this patch series ?
There was no further feedback (at least as far as I
The USB Type-C class is meant to provide unified interface to the
userspace to present the USB Type-C ports in a system.
Changes since v9:
- Minor typec_wcove.c cleanup as proposed by Guenter Roeck. No
function affect.
Changes since v8:
- checking sysfs_streq() result correctly in
