From: Dan Williams
It's confusing (to me at least) to keep on remembering the differences
between event rings (managed by the hardware) and non-event rings
managed by the host. Replace if (ring-type == FOO) branches with
ring ops that are specific to the type of ring.
This is a tradeoff of
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:37 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com wrote:
From: Dan Williams
It's confusing (to me at least) to keep on remembering the differences
between event rings (managed by the hardware) and non-event rings
managed by the host. Replace if (ring-type == FOO) branches
From: Dan Williams [mailto:dan.j.willi...@intel.com]
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:37 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com wrote:
From: Dan Williams
It's confusing (to me at least) to keep on remembering the differences
between event rings (managed by the hardware) and non-event rings
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:21 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com wrote:
From: Dan Williams [mailto:dan.j.willi...@intel.com]
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 3:37 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.com
wrote:
From: Dan Williams
It's confusing (to me at least) to keep on remembering the
It's confusing (to me at least) to keep on remembering the differences
between event rings (managed by the hardware) and non-event rings
managed by the host. Replace if (ring-type == FOO) branches with
ring ops that are specific to the type of ring.
This is a tradeoff of direct code readability
