RE: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-06-05 Thread Du, Changbin
Thanks, Machek, This patch has already been dropped. > On Tue 2016-05-03 11:04:24, changbin...@intel.com wrote: > > From: "Du, Changbin" > > > > On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. > > In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's

Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-06-04 Thread Pavel Machek
On Tue 2016-05-03 11:04:24, changbin...@intel.com wrote: > From: "Du, Changbin" > > On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. > In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the > name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'. And also we can change

Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-05-05 Thread Krzysztof Opasiak
On 05/06/2016 04:46 AM, Du, Changbin wrote: (...) >> Well, I'm not sure if any configfs interface has been proposed as easy >> to use from cmd line. I think they all has been proposed as *usable* >> from cmd line but not necessarily *easy to use*. >> >> That's why most of configfs clients has

RE: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-05-05 Thread Du, Changbin
> >>> On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. > >>> In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the > >>> name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'. > >> > >> Hmm libubsgx allows to do this for a very long time. You simply pass > >> NULL instead of pointer to

Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-05-05 Thread Krzysztof Opasiak
Hi, On 05/05/2016 07:46 AM, Du, Changbin wrote: > Hi, >>> On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. >>> In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the >>> name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'. >> >> Hmm libubsgx allows to do this for a very long time. You

RE: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-05-04 Thread Du, Changbin
Hi, > > On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. > > In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the > > name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'. > > Hmm libubsgx allows to do this for a very long time. You simply pass > NULL instead of pointer to usbg_udc. > >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] usb: configfs: allow UDC binding rule configured as binding to *any* UDC

2016-05-04 Thread Krzysztof Opasiak
On 05/03/2016 05:04 AM, changbin...@intel.com wrote: > From: "Du, Changbin" > > On most platforms, there is only one device controller available. > In this case, we desn't care the UDC's name. So let's ignore the > name by setting 'UDC' to 'any'. Hmm libubsgx allows to