Re: [usb-storage] Re: dealing with enclosures that don't handle READ_CAPACITY10

2013-09-04 Thread Oliver Neukum
On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 09:50 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > On 08/12/2013 03:17 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I got a bug report about an enclosure that mishandles READ_CAPACITY10. > > I don't want to introduce yet another quirk. So what about basing this > > on USB version? > > > Hmm.

Re: dealing with enclosures that don't handle READ_CAPACITY10

2013-08-19 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 08/12/2013 03:17 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Hi, > > I got a bug report about an enclosure that mishandles READ_CAPACITY10. > I don't want to introduce yet another quirk. So what about basing this > on USB version? > Hmm. You _sure_ it's restricted to USB 3.0? Seem like a generic USB firmware i

Re: dealing with enclosures that don't handle READ_CAPACITY10

2013-08-12 Thread Oliver Neukum
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 10:36 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I got a bug report about an enclosure that mishandles READ_CAPACITY10. > > I don't want to introduce yet another quirk. So what about basing this > > on USB version? > > > @@ -211,8

Re: dealing with enclosures that don't handle READ_CAPACITY10

2013-08-12 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Hi, > > I got a bug report about an enclosure that mishandles READ_CAPACITY10. > I don't want to introduce yet another quirk. So what about basing this > on USB version? > @@ -211,8 +212,12 @@ static int slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev) >

dealing with enclosures that don't handle READ_CAPACITY10

2013-08-12 Thread Oliver Neukum
Hi, I got a bug report about an enclosure that mishandles READ_CAPACITY10. I don't want to introduce yet another quirk. So what about basing this on USB version? Regards Oliver >From 58cb3cd4b8a58d986b74e0a41d52de989dbe64bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Oliver Neukum Da