On Mon, 2013-08-19 at 09:50 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> On 08/12/2013 03:17 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got a bug report about an enclosure that mishandles READ_CAPACITY10.
> > I don't want to introduce yet another quirk. So what about basing this
> > on USB version?
> >
> Hmm.
On 08/12/2013 03:17 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a bug report about an enclosure that mishandles READ_CAPACITY10.
> I don't want to introduce yet another quirk. So what about basing this
> on USB version?
>
Hmm. You _sure_ it's restricted to USB 3.0? Seem like a generic USB
firmware i
On Mon, 2013-08-12 at 10:36 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got a bug report about an enclosure that mishandles READ_CAPACITY10.
> > I don't want to introduce yet another quirk. So what about basing this
> > on USB version?
>
> > @@ -211,8
On Mon, 12 Aug 2013, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got a bug report about an enclosure that mishandles READ_CAPACITY10.
> I don't want to introduce yet another quirk. So what about basing this
> on USB version?
> @@ -211,8 +212,12 @@ static int slave_configure(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>
Hi,
I got a bug report about an enclosure that mishandles READ_CAPACITY10.
I don't want to introduce yet another quirk. So what about basing this
on USB version?
Regards
Oliver
>From 58cb3cd4b8a58d986b74e0a41d52de989dbe64bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oliver Neukum
Da