On Thursday, 15. November 2001 06:25, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> So we are in agreement here. It is legal to sleep, but extremely
> annoying when probing takes a long time. It also may be an issue
> with fast-boot systems for kiosks and cash registers.
Thanks to all for clarifying!
best regards
Wol
> > I did not see the original message from Dmitry. I disagree,
> > probe() only happens on the context of the insmod or its
> > children, or in init, or khubd. It certainly can call schedule().
>
> It can indeed, but khubd is the problem. It was discussed extensively on
> l-u-d at least 1 year a
Quoting Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > From: Wolfgang Mües <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:27:24 +0100
>
> > > If you have initialization done in probe() then it is automatically
> > > wrong, at very least because you are not running in freely b
Matthew Dharm wrote:
> Umm... Bjorn, spelling? uchi vs uhci?
Doh! That's what I get for letting my fingers do all the thinking...
/Björn - egg on face
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/l
Umm... Bjorn, spelling? uchi vs uhci?
Matt
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 08:37:53PM +0100, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> This doesn't look right:
>
> # lsmod
> Module Size Used by
> usb-uhci 21552 0 (unused)
> 3c509 7216 1 (autoclean)
> # rmmod usb-u
Cool, I had wondered if that kinda thing could be/was done (makes much more
sense), but there remains one thing to be resolved. The device still isn't
recognized as I described in the last e-mail unless we up the retrys to 3.
Is it possible to get that changed?
Thanks,
Ken Hahn
Engineer, Micro
> Ken Hahn wrote:
> I just looked at the usb code and it's changed a little while I was gone.
> So, I have a few questions. Some of this was in flux when I was around
> before.
I was just cleaning up before I got this message, and found a print of your
original code. I never managed to make it wo
On Wednesday, 14. November 2001 20:18, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> I did not see the original message from Dmitry. I disagree,
> probe() only happens on the context of the insmod or its
> children, or in init, or khubd. It certainly can call schedule().
Yes. But I have problems in calling functions li
This doesn't look right:
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
usb-uhci 21552 0 (unused)
3c509 7216 1 (autoclean)
# rmmod usb-uchi
rmmod: module usb-uchi is not loaded
2.4.14, after connecting-disconnecting-connecting my Archos harddisk.
/Björn
__
> From: Wolfgang Mües <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 19:27:24 +0100
> > If you have initialization done in probe() then it is automatically
> > wrong, at very least because you are not running in freely blockable
> > thread.
>
> If I *have* to do some initia
On Friday, 2. November 2001 23:59, Dmitri wrote:
> If you have initialization done in probe() then it is automatically
> wrong, at very least because you are not running in freely blockable
> thread.
If I *have* to do some initialisation in probe(), what should I do?
(Sending about 5-10 control
Howdy,Sorry this e-mail is a bit long, but hopefully I'll get all
my issues in one e-mail and not have to spam the list with a bunch of
questions.Last April (the fourth of April to be exact), I posted some
code here that allowed a BACKPACK USB adapter to be used under Linux.
I began to try
Hi, couldn't find any info on the maillist archive - so here goes -
is there a driver for the Adaptec USBXchange (USB-SCSI bridge)
device IDs are 3f3/2000. It's connected to a SCSI scanner BTW.
Cheers
Richard
_
Get your FREE downloa
13 matches
Mail list logo
