Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] 2.4.18-rc2-gregkh-1

2002-02-25 Thread Brad Hards
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:22, Greg KH wrote: > I just added David Brownell's USB 2.0 patch to my 2.4 BitKeeper tree, > and realized that the patch from my tree to a clean 2.4.18-rc2 tree is > pretty big. So I figured it's time to release a big patch :) > and contains the following patches: > - USB

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.5.5-pre1 rmmod usb-uhci hangs

2002-02-25 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002, Dan Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Johannes Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> remarked: > > Can you give this patch a whirl? It's relative to 2.4.18-rc2-gregkh-1 > > Sorry, didn't make any difference to the scanner. > > Now, in case it wasn't clear, the scanner does work,

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: 2.5.5-pre1 rmmod usb-uhci hangs

2002-02-25 Thread Dan Hopper
Johannes Erdfelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> remarked: > Can you give this patch a whirl? It's relative to 2.4.18-rc2-gregkh-1 Sorry, didn't make any difference to the scanner. Now, in case it wasn't clear, the scanner does work, it just bumps and grinds it's way down the page in the process with uhci

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RFC: interrupt transfer model

2002-02-25 Thread David Brownell
> If INTs could be queued, there would not really even be a need to > 'resubmit' the URBs. The completion handler can simply resubmit a > completed URB (if desired) without any loss of data or polling time. For the record, this is going down the path of the "support multi-buffering" proposal I s

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RFC: interrupt transfer model

2002-02-25 Thread ..tom
Dan Streetman wrote a lot of stuff about interrupt transfer model... > So, if my opinion counts for anything, I would vote for (first) allow > INT URBs to be queued and (second) remove URB > auto-resubmission entirely. I was too lazy to write up such a detailed discussion, but I agree 100% w

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PATCH: usb-storage: ISD-200 fixes, more unusual devices, and many cleanups

2002-02-25 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 07:33:18PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Greg et al -- > > Attached to this message is a patch for usb-storage against 2.4.18-rc4. > Please apply. Greg, it should also be applied to 2.5.x, but I don't have a > good patch against that version. So, if you want to try to ma

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RFC: interrupt transfer model

2002-02-25 Thread Dan Streetman
I _really_ like usb-ohci's behavior, and I wish usb-uhci/uhci behaved the same way. In particular, I think queueing INTs is essential. Allowing queueing (could) lead to not auto-resubmitting. If INTs could be queued, there would not really even be a need to 'resubmit' the URBs. The completion

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Add OV511 decompressor

2002-02-25 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
>Greetings, > >On Friday 22 February 2002 23:24, Mark McClelland wrote: >> Randy.Dunlap wrote: >> >There was a lot of discussion about 1.5 years back that most of >> >the video decompression and format conversion stuff should be >> >done in userspace, and that maybe a video conversion library >> >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: PATCH: usb-storage: ISD-200 fixes, more unusual devices, and many cleanups

2002-02-25 Thread Matthew Dharm
Hrm... looks like that bit might have slipped through improperly. As the comment says, it was needed for 2.4.9 -- I think someone's tree must still have that (improperly) and it just got caught in the patch. I'll remove it from our tree. Matt On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:51:14AM -0800, Greg KH w

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PATCH: usb-storage: ISD-200 fixes, more unu sual devices, and many cleanups

2002-02-25 Thread Matthew Dharm
Leif -- Is there any reason these devices cannot use the ScanLogic firmware update which is posted on their web page? That firmware fixes the problem at it's source Matt On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:37:58AM -0900, Leif Sawyer wrote: > Matthew Dharm writes: > > > > Attached to this message i

RE: [linux-usb-devel] PATCH: usb-storage: ISD-200 fixes, more unusual devices, and many cleanups

2002-02-25 Thread Leif Sawyer
Matthew Dharm writes: > > Attached to this message is a patch for usb-storage against > 2.4.18-rc4. > Please apply. > [snip-ola] Matt, Here is an updated patch which adds ScanLogic USB devices reported by myself, Rene Engelhard, Peter Wächtler, Dylan Egan, and Ashley Pittman. This was origina

[linux-usb-devel] Re: PATCH: usb-storage: ISD-200 fixes, more unusual devices, and many cleanups

2002-02-25 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 07:33:18PM -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > Greg et al -- > > Attached to this message is a patch for usb-storage against 2.4.18-rc4. > Please apply. Greg, it should also be applied to 2.5.x, but I don't have a > good patch against that version. So, if you want to try to ma

[linux-usb-devel] Re: PATCH: audio driver urb allocation

2002-02-25 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 10:30:30PM -0800, David Brownell wrote: > This fixes a bug in the audio driver which came from an > incorrect conversion from static to dynamic URB allocation. > It's against 2.5.5 Thanks for catching this, applied. greg k-h __

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add OV511 decompressor

2002-02-25 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:38:10PM -0800, Mark McClelland wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > >What this means is you didn't send me all of the changesets from when > >you cloned my tree to the one that you sent me. > > > >Can you either send me all of the changesets, or just send me a patch? > > > > He

[linux-usb-devel] ANTS Groupware 2002 promotion!

2002-02-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Customer & Reseller, FOR CUSTOMER == ANTS Groupware 2002 connects company's branches, customers & vendors together. User can share their files, emails, bookmarks, schedule and more over the Internet, Extranet & Intranet. It is runs on Linux platform so that it can save your