Re: [linux-usb-devel] isp1161 with StrongARM

2002-02-26 Thread Roman Weissgaerber
Hi, my latest version of the isp1161 driver is 0.9.5 (form Octobr 2001). It is still experimental. (some Bugs ISOC transfers not tested) Regards Roman Roger Barraud wrote: >Hi Wolfgang et alia, > I'm (hopefully) most of the way thru porting the 0.8 patch from the >sourceforge site to P

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Polling an USB Keyboard on UHCI

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:17:36AM +0100, Sebastien Lelarge wrote: > There is one thing I'm not understanding : what is the link between the > URBs, declared in the drivers (like usbkbd, usbmouse, ...) and the way > they are processed. How does the UHCI detect that a device has a > request, and ho

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PATCH: audio driver cancellation

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 10:38:56AM -0800, Geoff Keating wrote: > > Starting a command-line mp3 player on a system with USB speakers, > and then trying to stop it with control-C, didn't work; at best it > didn't stop right away, at worst kernel panics. > > It turned out that if a request is stopp

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [patch] uhci.c, speed improvements

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 03:12:05PM -0500, Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > I originally developed this patch to increase performance in uhci.c, but > I sent it out for someone to check if it fixes a performance problem > they were having the other day. Thanks for the patch, I added it to both my 2.4 and

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] 2.4.18-rc2-gregkh-1

2002-02-26 Thread Brad Hards
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 07:16, David Brownell wrote: > The "fxload" utility (on linux-hotplug) works nicely to download > FX2 firmware, including test firmware. I just checked in some > updates for second stage loader support ... needs more testing > though. (And note that "fxload" is now linux-hot

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PROBLEM: Oops using the visor driver

2002-02-26 Thread Hugo Haas
* Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-02-26 15:02-0800] > > Can't usb_serial_disconnect() take the semaphore visor_close() takes ? > > Yes it could, but there would still be a small race window. I would > have to push "down (&port->sem);" back to the serial_close() function. > > Hm, that might be

Re: [linux-usb-devel] isp1161 with StrongARM

2002-02-26 Thread Roger Barraud
Hi Wolfgang et alia, I'm (hopefully) most of the way thru porting the 0.8 patch from the sourceforge site to Prolificx Eagle (Lander) which uses SA1110. I've spent about 20 hours so far. Hopefully I'll be supplying a patch next few days as per GPL... Cheers Roger Barraud Snr S/W Engineer

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add OV511 decompressor

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 04:42:09AM -0800, Mark McClelland wrote: > > Ever since I created the ov511-1.49 changeset, I get a revision to my > ChangeSet file whenever I do a pull: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED], 2002-02-25 19:10:39-08:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Merge bk://linuxusb.bkbits.net/usb-2.5 > into

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [patch for 2.5] support for hp jornada

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 03:50:04PM +0530, V Ganesh wrote: > hi, > this is a > bk export -tpatch followed by a bk send -wgzip_uu -r+ > the bk tree has been cloned from greg's 2.5 tree. > it adds hp jornada support to the ipaq usbserial driver. Applied, thanks. greg k-h ___

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [patch for 2.4] support for hp jornada

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 03:52:01PM +0530, V Ganesh wrote: > hi, > this is a > bk export -tpatch followed by a bk send -wgzip_uu -r+ > the bk tree has been cloned from greg's 2.4 tree. > it adds hp jornada support to the ipaq usbserial driver. Looks good, thanks. Applied. Thanks also for

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PROBLEM: Oops using the visor driver

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 07:51:37PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > On Tuesday 26 February 2002 18:32, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:06:32PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > it seems that serial_disconnect() can race with visor_close() > > > > Yup it sure can :) > > >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] 2.4.18-rc2-gregkh-1

2002-02-26 Thread Brad Hards
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 07:16, David Brownell wrote: > > Previously, the EZUSB-FX2 devel board (generously provided by Cypress - > > thanks!) wouldn't enumerate (maybe one time in 100). It now enumerates > > every time, coming up in high speed mode on the NEC EHCI card (provided > > by Orange Micro -

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [patch] uhci.c, speed improvements

2002-02-26 Thread David Brownell
> and for giggles, I tried out EHCI with USB 2.0: > > [ a bit better than 4x improvement in elapsed time ] > Dave, any idea why the system time is so high with ehci-hcd? That version still has the debugging forced on. A fine way to chew up kernel cycles ... :) I'll have to submit a patch to br

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] 2.4.18-rc2-gregkh-1

2002-02-26 Thread David Brownell
> Previously, the EZUSB-FX2 devel board (generously provided by Cypress - > thanks!) wouldn't enumerate (maybe one time in 100). It now enumerates every > time, coming up in high speed mode on the NEC EHCI card (provided > by Orange Micro - thanks!). > > I haven't tried any more testing, but s

[linux-usb-devel] [patch] uhci.c, speed improvements

2002-02-26 Thread Johannes Erdfelt
I originally developed this patch to increase performance in uhci.c, but I sent it out for someone to check if it fixes a performance problem they were having the other day. Basically, the patch turns switching off FSBR into a lazy operation with the assumption there will be another transfer shor

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RFC: interrupt transfer model

2002-02-26 Thread David Brownell
> >One difference between that and what Roman sketched > >was that I did was in the model for schedule management: > > > >- He suggested a new HCD level "set_endpoint_properties" > > call (perhaps coupled to set_config and set_interface?) > > to schedule the bandwidth. > > > This is just the old

[linux-usb-devel] Remaining 2.4.x patches

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
Hi all, If you didn't see your patch for 2.4.x that you had previously sent me just get sent to Marcelo, don't worry. I still have about 75Kb of patches left to go, plus the ones that showed up in my inbox today :) I'll wait for 2.4.19-pre2 to come out to send the next round, as I just sent abo

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 6 of 6] USB uhci driver update

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
Hi, Here's a patch against 2.4.19-pre1 that updates the USB uhci driver. The patch is from Johannes Erdfelt, and does the following: - fixes a toggle bug - fixes a compiler warning - fixes problem where interrupt URB is unlinked in the driver's completion handle

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 4 of 6] USB ibmcam driver updates

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
Hi, Here's a patch against 2.4.19-pre1 that updates the USB ibmcam driver to the latest version. It does the following: - updates the documentation - adds Velo Stingray support - fixes hotplug table dependency upon now-defunct symbol - deletes drivers/usb/ibmcam.

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 3 of 6] USB build changes

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
Hi, Here's a patch against 2.4.19-pre1 that adds the USB 2.0 controller and auerswald drivers to the build process. thanks, greg k-h diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/Config.in b/drivers/usb/Config.in --- a/drivers/usb/Config.in Mon Feb 25 16:54:33 2002 +++ b/drivers/usb/Config.in Mon Feb 25

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 5 of 6] USB visor driver update

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
Hi, Here's a patch against 2.4.19-pre1 that adds support to the USB visor driver for the Palm m515 and Sony Clie S-360 devices. thanks, greg k-h diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/serial/visor.c b/drivers/usb/serial/visor.c --- a/drivers/usb/serial/visor.cMon

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 2 of 6] USB auerswald driver

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
Hi, Here's a patch against 2.4.19-pre1 that adds the USB auerswald driver. This driver was written by Wolfgang Muees. thanks, greg k-h diff -Nru a/CREDITS b/CREDITS --- a/CREDITS Mon Feb 25 16:54:34 2002 +++ b/CREDITS Mon Feb 25 16:54:34 2002 @@ -2130,6 +2130,10 @@ S: Fullarton 5063 S:

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PROBLEM: Oops using the visor driver

2002-02-26 Thread Oliver Neukum
On Tuesday 26 February 2002 18:32, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:06:32PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > it seems that serial_disconnect() can race with visor_close() > > Yup it sure can :) > > Any ideas on how to solve this race? I can't reproduce it to test > different

[linux-usb-devel] PATCH: audio driver cancellation

2002-02-26 Thread Geoff Keating
Starting a command-line mp3 player on a system with USB speakers, and then trying to stop it with control-C, didn't work; at best it didn't stop right away, at worst kernel panics. It turned out that if a request is stopped half-way using usb_unlink_urb, the completion routine never gets run, an

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PROBLEM: Oops using the visor driver

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 01:29:11PM -0500, Hugo Haas wrote: > * Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-02-26 09:32-0800] > > Any ideas on how to solve this race? I can't reproduce it to test > > different things here, but lots of different people keep reporting it. > > It's time to organize a bake sal

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PROBLEM: Oops using the visor driver

2002-02-26 Thread Hugo Haas
* Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-02-26 09:32-0800] > Any ideas on how to solve this race? I can't reproduce it to test > different things here, but lots of different people keep reporting it. It's time to organize a bake sale and get Greg a bunch of PDAs! :-) [..] > Hugo, one work around is

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RFC: interrupt transfer model

2002-02-26 Thread Roman Weissgaerber
Dan Streetman wrote: >On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Roman Weissgaerber wrote: > >>>- I'd suggested that the bandwidth would stay scheduled until >>> after an interrupt transfer completed, there was no transfer >>> queued. >>> >>If I understand you right here, I think you lose the offset (or phase) >>infor

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PROBLEM: Oops using the visor driver

2002-02-26 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 06:06:32PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Hi, > > it seems that serial_disconnect() can race with visor_close() Yup it sure can :) Any ideas on how to solve this race? I can't reproduce it to test different things here, but lots of different people keep reporting it. I

Re: [linux-usb-devel] PROBLEM: Oops using the visor driver

2002-02-26 Thread Oliver Neukum
Hi, it seems that serial_disconnect() can race with visor_close() Regards Oliver ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RFC: interrupt transfer model

2002-02-26 Thread Dan Streetman
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Roman Weissgaerber wrote: >>- I'd suggested that the bandwidth would stay scheduled until >> after an interrupt transfer completed, there was no transfer >> queued. >> >If I understand you right here, I think you lose the offset (or phase) >information >of the interrupt sc

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RFC: interrupt transfer model

2002-02-26 Thread Dan Streetman
I guess I should have read that more closely ;-) Yep, your #2 part (1) is certainly what sounds the best to me. And as you said, it would remove any need for special handling of int-outs. And the BW should certainly be allocated while any URBs are in the queue. Also, this would be a good oppor

[linux-usb-devel] isp1161 with StrongARM

2002-02-26 Thread Wolfgang Heidrich
Hello, just a short question: Do you think that Romans USB-HCD-patch for the isp1161-Chip is also going to work on Linux/Strong ARM SA1110? Are there only small changes necessary (addresses etc.) to get it working? Is there anyone who already had (positive) experience with isp1161/StrongARM SA1

[linux-usb-devel] Re: PROBLEM: Oops using the visor driver

2002-02-26 Thread Hugo Haas
* Hugo Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-02-26 08:50-0500] > Here is what happened when I did a sync: [..] FWIW, the second time I did a sync with J-Pilot, nothing happened, and I just got an oops with pilot-xfer. The call trace is slightly different, so I thought I would sond information about this

[linux-usb-devel] PROBLEM: Oops using the visor driver

2002-02-26 Thread Hugo Haas
Hi. I am using 2.4.18, with the patch adding support for the Sony Clie PEG-S360[1]. I am using J-Pilot 0.99.2, with the new pilot-link code (2002-02-17_05h.59m.23s snapshot). Here is what happened when I did a sync: Feb 26 08:07:14 home kernel: hub.c: USB new device connect on bus1/1, assign

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add OV511 decompressor

2002-02-26 Thread Mark McClelland
Greg KH wrote: >On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:38:10PM -0800, Mark McClelland wrote: > >>Here's a treediff between your tree and mine (which also doubles as a >>patch). As you can see, my tree is OK, but its metadata must be corrupt. >> > >No, it means that you didn't send me all of the changesets t

[linux-usb-devel] [patch for 2.4] support for hp jornada

2002-02-26 Thread V Ganesh
hi, this is a bk export -tpatch followed by a bk send -wgzip_uu -r+ the bk tree has been cloned from greg's 2.4 tree. it adds hp jornada support to the ipaq usbserial driver. thanks, ganesh # This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project: # Project Name: greg k-h's linux 2

[linux-usb-devel] [patch for 2.5] support for hp jornada

2002-02-26 Thread V Ganesh
hi, this is a bk export -tpatch followed by a bk send -wgzip_uu -r+ the bk tree has been cloned from greg's 2.5 tree. it adds hp jornada support to the ipaq usbserial driver. thanks, ganesh # This is a BitKeeper generated patch for the following project: # Project Name: greg k-h's linux

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Polling an USB Keyboard on UHCI

2002-02-26 Thread Sebastien Lelarge
Johannes Erdfelt wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2002, Sebastien Lelarge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I'm trying to poll a keyboard with interrupts disabled. This is for > > > using an USB Keyboard in a debugger (INTs are disabled in order to do > > > not disturb the CPU when debugging). I've t

Re: [linux-usb-devel] RFC: interrupt transfer model

2002-02-26 Thread Roman Weissgaerber
David Brownell wrote: >>If INTs could be queued, there would not really even be a need to >>'resubmit' the URBs. The completion handler can simply resubmit a >>completed URB (if desired) without any loss of data or polling time. >> > >For the record, this is going down the path of the "support >