On Fri, May 10, 2002, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:10:20AM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> >
> > This patch is relative to 2.4.19-pre8, however I think it can be
> > applied, and should be applied, to 2.5 as well.
>
> I applied it to the 2.5 tree. I'll apply
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:10:20AM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
>
> This patch is relative to 2.4.19-pre8, however I think it can be
> applied, and should be applied, to 2.5 as well.
I applied it to the 2.5 tree. I'll apply it to the usb 2.4 tree, but I
think Marcelo wants to put out a 2.4.19
There was a discussion a long time ago about how safe the bit operations
were as well as recently.
set_bit/clear_bit are not safe on x86 UP, nor are they safe on other
architectures. It's also unclear from the UHCI spec if the HC's are safe
with respect to atomic updates to the status field.
Thi
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 11:43:51PM +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> On a sidenote: It works when using the "usb.patch" from
> Georg Acher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. I still get a first unsuccessful
> id assignment but it works the second time:
> May 10 22:57:52 editower kernel: hub.c: USB new devi
Hi all,
Ok, I took the latest cvs version of the usb-storage code, and merged it
together with the latest 2.5.15 version (yes bk rocks, it wasn't hard at
all.) I then hand fixed up the places where the usb-storage code would
not compile properly and added some unusual-devs.h entries that were in
Recently I have written three drivers for USB SmartMedia readers.
One reached 2.5.13. One is visible on ftp.XX.kernel.org.
The third was this evening.
Such drivers share a lot of code, and instead of having N copies
of the code (as is already today visible in usb/storage) I separated
out all that
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:07:22PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> If you could please. Some logic around this section of code was changed
> in 2.4.19-pre5, so testing with 2.4.19-pre8 would be helpful.
Still the same error:
Linux version 2.4.19-pre8 (eduard@editower)
(gcc version 2.95.3
Hi,
Attached is a patch that is currently living in the -dj kernel tree. In
looking on your website, it looks like this is the most recent version.
I'd like to add this to the mainline 2.5 kernel if you don't mind, in
order to cut down on the USB specific changes in the -dj kernel.
Is this ok w
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 09:17:25PM +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 09:25:44AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > Which kernel are you using that this change was needed?
>
> I tried it with a SuSE-modified (I only replaced usbcore.o)
> Linux version 2.4.18-4GB ([EMAIL PRO
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 09:25:44AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Which kernel are you using that this change was needed?
I tried it with a SuSE-modified (I only replaced usbcore.o)
Linux version 2.4.18-4GB ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
(gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)) #1 Wed Mar 27 13:57:05 U
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 07:00:08PM +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> Hello again!
>
> As mentioned on the -users list I have a problem with
> my sl11r USB/IDE adapter + harddisk. The initial
> messages when connecting are:
>
> May 10 18:04:43 editower kernel: hub.c: USB new device connect on
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 10:38:55AM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> Most of this looks like the code that is in the CVS repository. I guess
> someone fed it into the -dj tree without telling anyone.
>
> But, the CVS tree looks notably more current. You're time is much better
> spent pulling the la
Hi Matt,
Below is a patch that I took from the latest -dj tree that modifies a
lot of the usb-storage files. I'd like to apply this to the mainline
2.5 kernel tree, but wanted to check with you first.
Where did this patch come from? And is it ok to apply? It looks like
some people are using i
Most of this looks like the code that is in the CVS repository. I guess
someone fed it into the -dj tree without telling anyone.
But, the CVS tree looks notably more current. You're time is much better
spent pulling the latest CVS code and integrating the latest patch (which
mostly just update
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 07:00:08PM +0200, Eduard Hasenleithner wrote:
> Hello again!
>
> As mentioned on the -users list I have a problem with
> my sl11r USB/IDE adapter + harddisk. The initial
> messages when connecting are:
Which kernel are you using that this change was needed?
thanks,
gr
> The real race is in uhci_fsbr_timeout. If the transfer starts moving
> again, then we will have read td->status, set the IOC bit and wrote it
> back out again while the HC clears the ACTIVE bit behind our backs.
And by using read/modify/write, you ensure that you won't lose
that bit. Even if t
Hello again!
As mentioned on the -users list I have a problem with
my sl11r USB/IDE adapter + harddisk. The initial
messages when connecting are:
May 10 18:04:43 editower kernel: hub.c: USB new device connect on bus2/2, assigned
device number 2
May 10 18:04:43 editower kernel: usb-uhci.c: inter
Hi Dave,
Thank you so much for your suggestions. I'll try all of them.
Regards,
James
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 09, 2002, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Linus said ...)
>
> > SMP-atomicity automatically gives DMA master atomicity on x86 too, but it
> > is certainly the case that that is not guaranteed on other architectures
>
> Similarly, not all devices use read/modify/write ...
> I'm using kernel 2.5.8. When my Adaptec USB2connect for
> Notebooks USB 2.0 Cardbus Adapter is plugged in to my
> Dell Inspiron 4100 notebook and I press the power switch
> on, I get an Oops message during bootup.
Did you try 2.5.15? I suspect you won't see much change
there, but it'd be good
Hello
This time with content, i hope ;-)
Allen Curtis schrieb:
> We are testing USB on an IBM 405GP and having some interesting problems. Let
> me apologize in advance if these are old issues. Just point me to where I
> can get the patches. THX
>
> 1. Selected the USB dev fs support but /proc/b
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the
22 matches
Mail list logo
