Yes and no.
Parts of it look okay, and parts don't. What immediately jumps out at me
are a couple of changes that I can't identify the reasoning -- i.e. why
have retries dropped from 10 to 3 in one place?
Perhaps I just haven't stared at this enough. Only about 2 hours ago did I
get synced up
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 03:37:00PM -0700, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> Is this patch against the latest code (i.e. Greg's super merge)? Or has
> that material not yet been released? I saw the patch go out, but I'm still
> getting up-to-speed on the Bitkeeper stuff
Yes, everything that went out in
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 01:48:21PM +0800, Corporal Pisang wrote:
> CONFIG_USB_UHCI_HCD=y
> CONFIG_USB_UHCI=y
You can't have 2 drivers for the same host controller, that's the
problem. I'll fix up the Config.in rules to prevent this from
happening. Change both of them to "m" and you should be fi
On Mon, 20 May 2002 15:32, Ben Simkin wrote:
> I would like to ask if it were possible to setup TCP/IP over USB
> (without an ethernet USB chip, or whatever they use)...
>
> You see, I want to setup a 2-way satellite system, and AFAIK, the
> "modem" connects to the PC using USB, and the modem does
Excuse my ignorance, or if this is a clever question, then
praise me ;)
Anyway,
I would like to ask if it were possible to setup TCP/IP over USB
(without an ethernet USB chip, or whatever they use)...
You see, I want to setup a 2-way satellite system, and AFAIK, the
"modem" connects to
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 10:41:28AM +0800, Corporal Pisang wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I get this error while compiling 2.5.16
Did you run 'make oldconfig' first?
What does the USB section of your .config look like? I can't seem to
reproduce this.
thanks,
greg k-h
___
Hi,
I get this error while compiling 2.5.16
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wno-trigrap
hs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe
-mpreferred-s
tack-boundary=2 -march=athlon-DKBUILD_BASENAME=usb_uhci -c -o usb-uhci.o
us
b-uhc
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 01:01:40AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BTW - Now that I write anyway, a question: One of the things
> I did was replacing half a dozen identical copies of some
> scatter-gather code by a single copy.
> But is it really necessary to have even this single copy?
> It is
Is this patch against the latest code (i.e. Greg's super merge)?
Or has that material not yet been released? I saw the patch go out,
but I'm still getting up-to-speed on the Bitkeeper stuff
The patch was against 2.5.16.
I know that CVS repositories exist, but so far have never l
Is this patch against the latest code (i.e. Greg's super merge)? Or has
that material not yet been released? I saw the patch go out, but I'm still
getting up-to-speed on the Bitkeeper stuff
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maintainer, Linux USB M
Created the first of a series of usb-storage patches
this afternoon. Please find it below or on ftp.XX.kernel.org
under people/aeb/2.5.16-us-patch .
It removes 5% of the usb-storage code, but should, if I made
no mistake, not affect the behaviour of the code.
(This is the introduction of raw_bulk
> > What is an instance ? As I understand it, it's just the number of an
> > axis in the range [0..8]. If available axes are not enough, we can add
> > new ones (REL_DIAL0 to REL_DIALn, with n almost as big as you want). We
> > have plenty of room (16 bits on 32-bits intel cpus).
>
> No, we c
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 12:57:40AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 07:27:57PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 May 2002, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > | diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c b/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c
> > | --- a/drivers/usb/input/hid-core.cTue May
13 matches
Mail list logo
