Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.5.43 and some automatic checking

2002-10-18 Thread David Brownell
Stuart MacDonald wrote: Below you will find the log of a recent 2.5.43 test of the whiteheat driver; stock kernel, using the driver that's included. Some automatic checks have been triggered, and I'm wondering where the error lies. I don't think I'm calling usb_clear_halt in a an illegal manner

[linux-usb-devel] Re: Zaurus support for usbnet

2002-10-18 Thread David Brownell
Hi Pavel, This is zaurus support for usbnet. Unlike usbdnet, it should not eat disks. Diff against 2.5.42; please apply. Thanks! How did you know I wanted to see a patch like this? :) I did some minor cleanups ... can you retest the attached patch? - your base patch - adds a more complete

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [patch 2.5.43] LDM and driver binding

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:37:26PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > Here's a more complete patch for that driver binding problem. > Now (a) when scanning for a driver to handle a new device, > scanning stops after the first successful probe not the > first successful match; and (b) new drivers get ev

[linux-usb-devel] 2.5 usb status

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
Hi all, Sorry for the delay in getting some of the more recent patches sent to me out to Linus, but it's been a busy week... Anyway, I think I've handled everything that has been sent to me, with the exception of Oliver's change configuration patch, and my previous device reference count patch.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] ibmcam -- halts on ISO endpoints ??

2002-10-18 Thread David Brownell
Who knows what the story is there ... according to the USB spec, iso endpoints can't halt, so it's pointless to even try. So why does that driver try? Is that product breaking the spec, or is that logic not necessary? You probably refer to this: usb_clear_halt(uvd->dev, usb_rcvisocpipe(uvd->d

Re: [linux-usb-devel] ibmcam -- halts on ISO endpoints ??

2002-10-18 Thread Dmitri
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 10:31, David Brownell wrote: > Who knows what the story is there ... according to the > USB spec, iso endpoints can't halt, so it's pointless > to even try. > > So why does that driver try? Is that product breaking > the spec, or is that logic not necessary? You probably r

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [usb-storage] problem clearing halts

2002-10-18 Thread David Brownell
I'd really like an HCD guy to look at this. I've tested this every way I can think of -- attempts to clear the halt on the bulk-in endpoint all return -EPIPE. I know that the device is okay, because the same sequence on 2.4.x works just fine. I think I got it. Basically, in 2.5 usb_pipein()

[linux-usb-devel] ibmcam -- halts on ISO endpoints ??

2002-10-18 Thread David Brownell
Who knows what the story is there ... according to the USB spec, iso endpoints can't halt, so it's pointless to even try. So why does that driver try? Is that product breaking the spec, or is that logic not necessary? - Dave --- This sf.net

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.781.21.15, 2002/10/17 23:38:08-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] Add support for JTEC FA8101 USB to Ethernet device o Add support for JTEC FA8101 USB to Ethernet device diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/net/pegasus.h b/drivers/usb/net/pegasus.h --- a/drivers/usb/net/pegasus.h Fri Oct 18 14:4

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.781.21.17, 2002/10/18 09:34:20-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] uhci interrupt resubmit fixes After the interrupt queueing was added, I don't think the old way of resetting interrupts will work anymore. This patch changes it to simply do a full unlink and resubmission automatically.

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.798.4.5, 2002/10/18 14:18:29-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] char tipar driver minor update you will find a patch for the tipar char driver. This patch fixes some typos and add a documentation entry. diff -Nru a/Documentation/tipar.txt b/Documentation/tipar.txt --- /dev/null Wed

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.793.1.19, 2002/10/18 11:35:15-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] USB: fix problem with removing a USB root hub. diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/core/usb.c b/drivers/usb/core/usb.c --- a/drivers/usb/core/usb.cFri Oct 18 14:42:59 2002 +++ b/drivers/usb/core/usb.cFri Oct 18 14:42:59 2002 @@ -790,

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.798.4.4, 2002/10/18 14:18:15-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] cpia fix for older compilers diff -Nru a/drivers/media/video/cpia.h b/drivers/media/video/cpia.h --- a/drivers/media/video/cpia.hFri Oct 18 14:42:55 2002 +++ b/drivers/media/video/cpia.hFri Oct 18 14:42:55

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.793.1.18, 2002/10/18 10:13:22-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] driver core: fix up merge mess diff -Nru a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c --- a/drivers/base/core.c Fri Oct 18 14:43:02 2002 +++ b/drivers/base/core.c Fri Oct 18 14:43:02 2002 @@ -25,46 +25,6 @@ #define

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.781.39.1, 2002/10/17 23:21:37-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cset exclude: [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ChangeSet|20021015071026|11647 diff -Nru a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c --- a/drivers/base/core.c Fri Oct 18 14:43:27 2002 +++ b/drivers/base/core.c Fri Oct 18 14:43:27 200

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.793.1.17, 2002/10/18 10:00:13-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] merge between the usb and driver model trees. diff -Nru a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c --- a/drivers/base/core.c Fri Oct 18 14:43:06 2002 +++ b/drivers/base/core.c Fri Oct 18 14:43:06 2002 @@ -19,109 +19,

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.781.21.16, 2002/10/18 00:05:29-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] one liner, anti-oops This fixes a potential oops (depending on how the HCD handles it) from a recent patch of mine. Evidently I didn't test this bit a device that'd show the problem, sigh. Luckily Martin Diehl was testi

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.781.21.14, 2002/10/17 23:37:50-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] change devio-disconnect no-driver error code The talk about disconnect locking reminded me of this - the error code in the no-driver case for the disconnect ioctl isn't a unique error code. This changes the error code to

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.781.21.13, 2002/10/17 23:37:35-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] LDM and driver binding Here's a more complete patch for that driver binding problem. Now (a) when scanning for a driver to handle a new device, scanning stops after the first successful probe not the first successful matc

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.43

2002-10-18 Thread Greg KH
ChangeSet 1.781.21.11, 2002/10/17 17:16:04-07:00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [PATCH] usbtest updates Various small fixes and adds ids for new test firmware. diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c b/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.c --- a/drivers/usb/misc/usbtest.cFri Oct 18 14:43:30 2002 +++ b/drivers/

[linux-usb-devel] Re: usb storage sddr09

2002-10-18 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 09:55:49PM -0400, Ed Tomlinson wrote: > In the patch fest in the last couple of days usb storage support for sddr09 > has broken. I see the following in the log (2.5.43-mm2): > Oct 17 21:37:07 oscar kernel: sddr09: Found Flash card, ID = 00 00 00 00: Manuf. >unknown, 40

Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.5.42-ac1, 2.5.42, 2.5.41 boot hang with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG=n

2002-10-18 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
On 2002.10.15 19:10 David Brownell wrote: I don't know if it's important, but I had to enable usb keyboard legacy mode in the bios to have keyboard support in the bootloader stage. I had a bad feeling about the option though, a good bios is a lean bios. Unless your boot loader has a small

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: About the vicam driver(s)

2002-10-18 Thread John Tyner
> Yes, but Joe's was there first, based on the original driver, that's why > I accepted his patch. I understand that. My code is even based partially on it and wouldn't exist without the reverse engineering/color decoding information that I found at his site. > Could you point out the problems in

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Problem submitting ctrl_urb

2002-10-18 Thread Jan J. Jessen
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, David Brownell wrote: > > > FILL_CONTROL_URB(dev->ctrl_urb, > > dev->udev, > > usb_sndctrlpipe(dev->udev,0), > > (unsigned char*)&dev->dr, > > buff, > > 3, > >