Re: [linux-usb-devel] interrrupt URB's

2002-12-02 Thread Heinrich du Toit
Sorry me again. Ok I'll shutup after this. Just wanna let you know that my previous e-mail is wrong. unlinking the send doesn't help! It all continues in a happy send recieve loop! --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Get the new Palm Tun

Re: [linux-usb-devel] interrrupt URB's

2002-12-02 Thread Heinrich du Toit
Hello again Ok I've done abit of research/testing If I only unlink the URB used for sending data.. Then sending stops. And recieve also.. sicne the device first wants to send data before it can recieve data. But when I also unlink the URB used for recieving data.. Then all of a sudden everythin

Re: [linux-usb-devel] interrrupt URB's

2002-12-02 Thread Heinrich du Toit
David Brownell wrote: Heinrich du Toit wrote: Anyways from what I can find out the max bandwidth of my USB is 12Mbit/s And each device communicates at 1.6Mbit/s This means after I plugged in the 7th device (theoritcally) the bandwidth are full. And from then on things start to slow down or s

[linux-usb-devel] USB debugger

2002-12-02 Thread shino korah
Hi, Please help me to find some usb debuggers like usb sniffer/usb snoopy etc. I searched on the web and I could find those for windows not for Linux. Is there anything available for Linux.Any pointers will be helpful. Thanks in advance Shino ___

Re: [linux-usb-devel] FIXME in devio.c::proc_ioctl()

2002-12-02 Thread Oliver . Neukum
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, David Brownell wrote: > Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Am Samstag, 30. November 2002 22:48 schrieb David Brownell: > > > >>In short, you're saying that request does exactly what > >>it's intended to do. > > > > > > Upon further thought, it doesn't. You see, simulating > > a disconnec

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] USB requires MIDI (2.4.20)

2002-12-02 Thread Randy.Dunlap
Hi, Same patch was recently done for 2.5.x (with Kconfig); also needed in 2.4.20 (Config.in). Driver has unresolved references to sound/MIDI symbols (linker problems) without this if USB_MIDI = Y and SOUND isn't in-kernel. Please apply. -- ~Randy --- ./Config.in%MIDIThu Nov 28 15:53:14 2

Re: [linux-usb-devel] UHCI: known harware problems? BIOS?

2002-12-02 Thread David Brownell
The problem density for the cyberjack seams to depend on used PC hardware. Known systems have a timeout desity of 1 per 5 minutes, another 1 per 1 hour. The P4 I tested today had no problem in 3 hours. So are there known unreliabilites/bugs regarding USB host controllers? Someone posted some VI

Re: [linux-usb-devel] interrrupt URB's

2002-12-02 Thread David Brownell
Heinrich du Toit wrote: Anyways from what I can find out the max bandwidth of my USB is 12Mbit/s And each device communicates at 1.6Mbit/s This means after I plugged in the 7th device (theoritcally) the bandwidth are full. And from then on things start to slow down or seomthing like that. Hmm,

Re: [linux-usb-devel] FIXME in devio.c::proc_ioctl()

2002-12-02 Thread David Brownell
Oliver Neukum wrote: Am Samstag, 30. November 2002 22:48 schrieb David Brownell: In short, you're saying that request does exactly what it's intended to do. Upon further thought, it doesn't. You see, simulating a disconnect will not ensure that the device is in a usable state. In fact, in a d

Re: [linux-usb-devel] "(no bus?): hcd_unlink_urb fail -22" withcyberjack

2002-12-02 Thread David Brownell
Matthias Bruestle wrote: I'm currently testing 2.5 kernels to see if they are more reliable in my setup, but with 2.5.47 and 2.5.50 I get above message and it does not even a bit work. Any Idea? Try with a real 2.5.50 kernel ... it doesn't emit those messages. Usually, returning -EINVAL means

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb error on suse(long)

2002-12-02 Thread David Brownell
Correct me if I'm wrong ... this isn't really a usbdevfs problem, it's that problem with host controller drivers that don't queue control requests (uhci, usb-uhci). Yes? Userspace workarounds shouldn't be needed any more for 2.5 kernels. If it's really a usbdevfs problem, what is it, and why h

[linux-usb-devel] Re: usb_bulk_msg returns EOVERFLOW

2002-12-02 Thread Randy.Dunlap
On Fri, 29 Nov 2002, Romain Lievin wrote: | with kernel 2.4.20 , usb_bulk_msg returns EOVERFLOW in my tiglusb module. | I never got this with previous kernels. | What does it mean ? | Hi, Which USB host controller driver are you using when you see this? -- ~Randy [also moved to linux-usb-devel

[linux-usb-devel] UHCI: known harware problems? BIOS?

2002-12-02 Thread Matthias Bruestle
Mahlzeit The problem density for the cyberjack seams to depend on used PC hardware. Known systems have a timeout desity of 1 per 5 minutes, another 1 per 1 hour. The P4 I tested today had no problem in 3 hours. So are there known unreliabilites/bugs regarding USB host controllers? Linux is not

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-serial bug in 2.5

2002-12-02 Thread Greg KH
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:41:27PM +0530, V Ganesh wrote: > > I verified that the problem is caused by the down(&port->sem) at the beginning > of serial_write() (by adding a might_sleep() just before the down()). > unfortunately I don't have the time to investigate further, perhaps someone > more

[linux-usb-devel] interrrupt URB's

2002-12-02 Thread Heinrich du Toit
Hello again. Ok you know my storie by now :-) Anyways from what I can find out the max bandwidth of my USB is 12Mbit/s And each device communicates at 1.6Mbit/s This means after I plugged in the 7th device (theoritcally) the bandwidth are full. And from then on things start to slow down or seom

[linux-usb-devel] usb-serial bug in 2.5

2002-12-02 Thread V Ganesh
hi, I tried using the ipaq module over usbserial with the latest 2.5 tree from greg and hit what looks like a problem in usbserial.c. I compiled with SMP + sleep-inside-spinlock checking enabled and got a BUG() in serial_write() while running pppd. here's a sample stacktrace: Dec