[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] get rid of speedtouch kernel thread

2003-01-11 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:28:45PM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > speedtouch: remove the kernel thread and all the junk that went with it. > The work it did can all be done in interrupt context, so use a tasklet instead. Applied, thanks. greg k-h --

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] eliminate global minor array in speedtouch

2003-01-11 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:39:53PM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > This is the mysterious masked patch I just sent, but with a name this time. > > speedtouch: get rid of the global minor_data array. This means that there is now >no > limit to the number of devices that can be handled by the dri

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] remove redundant casts in speedtouch

2003-01-11 Thread Greg KH
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 08:36:35PM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote: > speedtouch: remove some redundant casts. Applied, thanks. greg k-h --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! ht

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Followup - USB ohci audio troubles

2003-01-11 Thread Kevin Brosius
David Brownell wrote: > > > Kevin Brosius wrote: > > > > After some testing with the ohci driver, I'm starting to suspect this is > > a documented problem in the AMD766 controller on the motherboard. > > Referring to > > http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/DevelopWithAMD/0,,30_2252_873_1130,00.ht

[linux-usb-devel] Next round of cleanups of midi

2003-01-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Hi, this fixes several deadlocks in the write path, does a general cleanup of locking and closes reentrancy races in read and write. Please test. Regards Oliver You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to: '| bk receive [path to repository]' or a

[linux-usb-devel] (¼ºÀα¤°í)Ãæ°ÝÀûÀÎ µ¿¿µ»óÀ» ¸ðµÎ °ø°³ÇÕ´Ï´Ù.

2003-01-11 Thread ÁÙ¸®¿§
Title: Çã¶ôµµ ¾øÀÌ È«º¸¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»µå·Á¼­ Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù Çã¶ôµµ ¾øÀÌ È«º¸¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»µå·Á¼­ Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù. ±ÍÇÏÀÇ ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀº ÀÎÅͳݻóÀ» ÅëÇØ ¾Ë°Ô µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ¾î¶°ÇÑ Á¤º¸µµ ¾ËÁö ¸øÇÔÀ» ¹àÈü´Ï´Ù. ¸¸ 19¼¼¹Ì¸¸ ¹Ì¼º³âÀÚ´Â µé¾î¿À½Ç ¼ö ¾øÀ¸¸ç µé¾î¿À¼Åµµ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ½Ç ¼ö ¾ø½À´Ï´Ù. °æ°í : Àý´ë ¼ºÀθ¸

Re: Discussing the URB lifecycle, again (was:Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] get rid of speedtouch kernel thread)

2003-01-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
> > - For a successful synchronous unlink, the completion handler did fire > >before the unlink call returned. Easily proven for HCDs that go > > through the "hcd.c" logic (*), otherwise you have to take it on faith. > > (And some older HCD code might bugs here, like not reporting > > complet

Re: Discussing the URB lifecycle, again (was:Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] get rid of speedtouch kernel thread)

2003-01-11 Thread Duncan Sands
On Saturday 11 January 2003 00:32, David Brownell wrote: > Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2003 22:16 schrieb Duncan Sands: > >>Hi Oliver, I decided to see how other drivers deal with this > >> usb_unlink_urb issue. The first thing I looked was devio.c. And guess > >> what, it loo