In 2.5.66 (and a couple prior versions, but this is only recently) I've
started seeing invalid HEADER messages in my log. Also some 'cannot
find HEADER' messages appear first. Should I be concerned? Log snippet
below:
Apr 4 19:46:06 sea kernel: usbaudio: registered mixer 14,64
Apr 4 19:46:06
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 02:48:33AM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> these calls either are unnecessary or harmful.
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 08:57:23AM -0600, Art Haas wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Here are two patches that convert the files to use C99 initializers. The
> patches are against current BK.
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Va
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 03:36:36PM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> So far as I know, "usbfs" was never documented ... so
> here's a patch with some text I've had sitting around,
> merging it into the other USB kerneldoc.
>
> It should be accurate, down to the warnings about why
> not to use several
On Sat, Mar 29, 2003 at 05:53:50PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Well I asked Pat, and he said it was ok to use.
> >
> > I'd prefer that, as we would not have to grab yet-another-lock in the
> > probe sequence. Just document it well :)
>
> Here it is. This time locking and doing the operatio
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 10:50:38AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> This patch:
Very nice.
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth!
No other company
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 08:14:00AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> I noticed that the usb_set_configuration() code was leaving
> endpoints halted ... likely not a problem just now since that
> routine can't be used safely except during enumeration, but
> better to fix this than not.
Applied, thanks
Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Freitag, 4. April 2003 22:07 schrieb Subrata Goswami:
Hi, have two simple questions.
1. If there are multiple driver modules (*.o) for a single USB device,
what precedence would be followed while loading them ? The
/etc/modules.conf file does not contain any of the drivers
Am Freitag, 4. April 2003 22:07 schrieb Subrata Goswami:
> Hi, have two simple questions.
>
> 1. If there are multiple driver modules (*.o) for a single USB device,
> what precedence would be followed while loading them ? The
> /etc/modules.conf file does not contain any of the drivers.
>
> 2. What
Hi, have two simple questions.
1. If there are multiple driver modules (*.o) for a single USB device,
what precedence would be followed while loading them ? The
/etc/modules.conf file does not contain any of the drivers.
2. What part of the USB code handles searching, selecting, and loading
th
Since the 2.5 crc library hasn't been backported
to the 2.4 tree yet, I included a crc routine in
the speedcrc files.
CREDITS |8
Documentation/Configure.help | 11
MAINTAINERS |8
drivers/usb/Config.in|1
drivers/usb/Makefile |
11 matches
Mail list logo
