[linux-usb-devel] From usb-user : KL5KUSB105D driver oops on load (Palm Connect)

2003-11-10 Thread Alban Browaeys
PS: still crash on 2.6.0-test9 devel envirronment; gcc 3.2, binutils 2.14.90.0.6-3 lspci: 00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) 00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) 00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB C

Re: [linux-usb-devel] oops with usb-uhci module

2003-11-10 Thread fee mail
here it is in diff -u old new format On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:51:30 -0800 "David Brownell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > diff -u old new--- usb-uhci.c.orig Mon Nov 10 23:37:44 2003 +++ usb-uhci.c Mon Nov 10 16:28:50 2003 @@ -795,7 +795,7 @@ list_add (&qh->desc_list, &urb_priv->desc_li

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage and Sony Handycam

2003-11-10 Thread Sancho Dauskardt
> Has anyone looked at why the reset failed? I assume that would clear the > sense. How could anyone attempt to find out why the reset failed? Just some ideas: a) not supported - AFAIK many storage devices don't seem to support the bulk-reset, as the 'Other Popular OS' doesn't seem to issue them.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] oops with usb-uhci module

2003-11-10 Thread fee mail
Here a patch sloving the probleme. On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 19:53:06 +0100 "fee mail" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > this happen with eci adsul usermode driver. > pppd crash with this oops on console. > > The field dev may be reseted so the the line 321 of usb.c > ("dev->bus->bandwidth_allocate

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage and Sony Handycam

2003-11-10 Thread Andries . Brouwer
Can someone verify my decoding? (This matches what Dmitri sent earlier that did not make it to the list, execept it looks like it starts with an INQUIRY VPD page 0 - get a list of supported VPD pages). No, that is not a SCSI command. > TransferBuffer: 0x0012 (18) length >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] "default 05f9/ffff" serial device?

2003-11-10 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 05:53:44PM +0100, Till Harbaum wrote: > > i am just equipping one of my devices with a serial USB port to use this as a > simple debug console to be displayed on my linux box. > > The driver lists a device with vendor/product id 05f9/ as the generic > serial device.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage and Sony Handycam

2003-11-10 Thread Patrick Mansfield
On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 07:45:46PM +1100, Dmitri Katchalov wrote: > [My previous msg didn't make it to the list, resending] > > Attached here for your perusal is USB log for this device on win98. Thanks. Can someone verify my decoding? (This matches what Dmitri sent earlier that did not make it

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage and Sony Handycam

2003-11-10 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:46:44PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > > How could anyone attempt to find out why the reset failed? The only > > externally visible state is the device's response to incomi

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage and Sony Handycam

2003-11-10 Thread Patrick Mansfield
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 01:46:44PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > How could anyone attempt to find out why the reset failed? The only > externally visible state is the device's response to incoming USB > requests. IIRC, it simply didn't respond to th

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage and Sony Handycam

2003-11-10 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:47:26PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > For CB and CBI devices, babble causes a DID_ERROR return. For Bulk-only > > it causes a Check-Condition status to be returned along with Invalid > > Command sense data. Like I s

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usb-storage and Sony Handycam

2003-11-10 Thread Patrick Mansfield
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:47:26PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 11:28:37AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > > A DID_ERROR causes scsi core to retry the command - it will not even check > > the sense data. A DID_ABORT might be bett