Buongiorno dal sistema Posta Sicura di Elitel.
Il nostro sistema antivirus della posta in entrata ha trovato un virus in un messaggio
a voi indirizzato.
Trovera' in allegato il messaggio originale, inviatoLe da:
senza le parti infette che il nostro sistema ha provveduto ad eliminare.
La inf
Greg,
I do not like my monkeying with the helper task, so
I am investigating a backport from 2.6 to 2.4.
I see that the hateful semaphore is gone. The disconnect is guarged by
a kobject, so this is good. However, what about the port->open_count?
It is manipulated without any locking, it seems.
David Mosberger wrote:
David,
Here is some comments on the 2.6.4 ohci driver relative to my original
proposed patch:
- The state which I called ED_DESCHEDULED you represent with
"ED_UNLINK && not on the ed_rm_list"
Actually I don't think there _is_ a state like that in
the current driver ... a
Juergen Stuber wrote:
It works flawlessly except for proper EHCI over a 2.0 hub,
which gives me a -ENOSPC on submitting the first interrupt in URB.
This needs to be investigated, but may take some time because I need
to learn how USB 2.0 works.
What's the period on that transfer? If it's 1 mse
ALL NEW INFORMATION:
I've done quite a bit of meticulous testing and found out some things that
blow parts of my previous mail out of the water.
1) Rebooted my laptop, plugged in the digital camera. Mounted it, copied
files to it. Unmounted it, removed the device. Plugged it back in
mounted
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Alan Stern wrote:
> > Something is different between 2.4.X and 2.6.X. Something in the iscan
> > (which is provided by Epson) code seems to trigger the problem quick.
> > (iscan also implements an "epkowa" driver in SANE).
>
> Also something is different between vuescan and i
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Alan Stern wrote:
> (It's easier to follow the conversation if you insert your replies in-line
> with the previous message, like I do in this reply. Don't top-post.)
>
Understood, sorry.
Also, as stated in a separate email that I will reference in this mail:
I own 3 devic
Hi,
How you doing, getting this kernel message when inserting my optio Pentax S camera.
Using latest kernel 2.6.4.
2.6.0 detected Optio Pentax S NOT Optio 330GS (like 2.6.4) But it still doesn't
recognise the partition table on both kernels. Hence cannot be mounted.
I can make a partition usi
(It's easier to follow the conversation if you insert your replies in-line
with the previous message, like I do in this reply. Don't top-post.)
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Jerry Kilpatrick wrote:
> I hate coincidences, but I'm still confused.
>
> I reverted back to last 2.4 kernel which happened to
Additional information. I own 3 devices that use usb_storage.
1) 128Mb Wrist watch (broken) (has never worked on this machine)
2) 64Mb Pen Drive (broken) (has definitely worked before but not now)
3) HP318 Digital Camera (works fine before and works fine now except it
still prints a lot of data
I hate coincidences, but I'm still confused.
I reverted back to last 2.4 kernel which happened to be 2.4.21 with the
preempt patch and software suspend patch installed. I plugged in my usb
storage device and it did the same thing. I was able to mount it and read
from it, but was unable to wri
Hi,
here is a patch against 2.6.4 that corrects problems in the
LEGO USB Tower driver, in particular the locking and sleeping
in interrupt context, and generally overhauls and cleans it up.
I have tested it with UHCI, OHCI and EHCI with and without hubs on
x86 machines. It works flawlessly excep
BANNED FILENAME ALERT
Our content checker found
banned name: Readme.zip
in email presumably from you (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>), to the following recipient:
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery of the email was stopped!
The message has been blocked because it contains a component
(as a MIME part or nest
Here's where all those preceding autoconfig patches start
to fit together: one gadget driver gets rid of almost all
the controller-specific #ifdeffery.
Two of the other gadget drivers can do the same thing,
and just as easily: file storage, and serial. (I'll
hope their maintainers do those chang
Colleen Przybyla wrote:
From user space, just stick to the file system API ... if for any
reason that's not working, it's just a bug. It should keep you from
being too wrong. In this case it sounds like you've strayed off the
path of righteousness by some indeterminate amount.
- Dave
I'm tryi
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Malcolm Blaney wrote:
> Using 2.6.2 I get one line from dmesg when plugging in a device:
> drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c: c400: wakeup_hc
> Nothing gets added to /proc/bus/usb/devices besides the uhci host
> controller info.
>
> After modprobing usbcore and uhci-hcd (but befor
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Matthias Andree wrote:
> (I've subscribed to the list now, no need to Cc: me on list replies.)
>
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> > From looking at your logs, I get the feeling that the initial problem
> > doesn't lies in the UHCI driver.
>
> OK, we'll take othe
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Jerry Kilpatrick wrote:
> Disclaimer: This is, at max, the second time I've ever submitted a bug,
> so I am doing the very best to do it all correctly.
You did a good job, lots of useful information included.
> I've attached my config.gz that was in /proc as well. Let m
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Max Zaitsev wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> may it be of importance that I have a relatively high-performance drive inside
> the box (7200RPM, 8MB cache, etc) so that I'm seeing the things nobody
> experienced before?
Maybe, but I doubt it. As far as I can tell, Linux is interactin
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Brad Campbell wrote:
> G'day all (again)
>
> I have happened upon a Genesys USB2->ide adaptor. I also happen to have a spare disk
> and some
> (limited) time to assist if I can the debugging of these adaptors.
>
> I noted a post by Alan Stern asking about the .inf file for
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004, Max Zaitsev wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> I've tired the patch and it worked even better then before :-) Seriously, I
> could copy some 500-700Mb to the drive, but then it hang again the same way
> as before. Looks like whatever we do makes the fault situation to occur less
> and l
-
VIRUS ALERT
Virus checker on SH found
virus: Worm.SomeFool.Gen-2
in your email to the following recipient:
-> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery of the email was stopped!
For further info please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you do
22 matches
Mail list logo
