[linux-usb-devel] (no subject)

2004-08-17 Thread 박호상
Hello. I want to know how bulk data is handled in g_serial.c I have changed the g_serial.c for printer. Device descriptor, interface descriptor, qualifier descriptor, endpoint and configuration descriptor were fixed for printer. Once, I wanted to verify whether data went to Target PC from Host PC

Re: [linux-usb-devel] regarding "[PATCH] USB: Patch to signal underflow in usb-storage driver" in linux 2.6.8

2004-08-17 Thread Andrew Pilley
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 00:16, Alan Stern wrote: > Actually the debug output probably won't help much, given the information > you've already posted. > > This looks a lot like something I fixed a month or two back, but the patch > got lost in the shuffle and the fix hasn't been applied. I just >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Problems with usb-ohci.c driver on PPC405 and ISOCHRONOUS transfers

2004-08-17 Thread Dale Farnsworth
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 09:21:47PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to run usb-ohci driver on ppc405 custom board with kernel 2.4.22. > > After adding some changes to code (mostly in initialization area and memory > mapped i/o access) I have control, bulk and interrupt tran

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Rx throughput

2004-08-17 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Dienstag, 17. August 2004 15:48 schrieb Sebastian Haas: > Hello, > > i'm currently developing an linux usb device driver. The drivers is done > but i've some problems with my throughput while receiving data. > > I starting a bulk transfer and waiting for his completition and process > the rece

RE: [PATCH][linux-usb-devel] Early USB handoff

2004-08-17 Thread Aleksey Gorelov
>You could reorder and simplify slightly the code for handing off a UHCI >controller. It's safer to disable PIRQD, SMI#, and legacy >support first >and then turn off the interrupt enable bits, all before stopping the >controller. You could even reset the controller rather than >just stopping

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] UDC gadget driver for lh7a40x (LPD SDK)

2004-08-17 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 16 August 2004 3:09 am, Bo Henriksen wrote: > > I've included the fixed patch below for you :) It still doesn't apply; looks like your mailer (a) morphed it to quoted printable, and (b) wrapped lines. Usually it's better to send patches as attachments when your mailer is doing stuff li

Re: [linux-usb-devel] regarding "[PATCH] USB: Patch to signal underflow in usb-storage driver" in linux 2.6.8

2004-08-17 Thread Andrew Pilley
Alrighty. Ran overnight for approximately 6-7 hours, and was working fine this morning. Of course, since it's statistically impossible to prove a negative in this situation, it's at least potentially working. I'll let it run longer later today. (and then I'll see if I can trigger any bugs under

[linux-usb-devel] Problems with usb-ohci.c driver on PPC405 and ISOCHRONOUS transfers

2004-08-17 Thread
Hello, I'm trying to run usb-ohci driver on ppc405 custom board with kernel 2.4.22. After adding some changes to code (mostly in initialization area and memory mapped i/o access) I have control, bulk and interrupt transfers o.k. The problem I'm trying to solve now is ISOCHRONOUS transfer.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 2.6.8-rc2] usb hub docs and locktree()

2004-08-17 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, David Brownell wrote: > Maybe ... it's not a simple locking problem though. > > Doctoral theses have been gotten in such areas, > though I hope none recently! (Now they just give > spurious software patents for trivial variants of old > schemes.) :-) I feel better now; we

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] g_serial ACM for review (resend)

2004-08-17 Thread Al Borchers
David -- (This is a resend with the .inf file removed and a few more details on using a Windows host with gadget serial.) Here is the g_serial ACM patch. It works with the Linux ACM driver and with Windows usbser.sys driver. I have only done very limited testing--just confirmed that the device is

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Rx throughput

2004-08-17 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Sebastian Haas wrote: > Hello, > > i'm currently developing an linux usb device driver. The drivers is done > but i've some problems with my throughput while receiving data. > > I starting a bulk transfer and waiting for his completition and process > the received data (in m

Re: [linux-usb-devel] regarding "[PATCH] USB: Patch to signal underflow in usb-storage driver" in linux 2.6.8

2004-08-17 Thread Alan Stern
On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Andrew Pilley wrote: > okay, got a chance to catch the hang with debug mode on. First, I'll > paste the output of alt-sysrq-t for the usb-storage thread here: > > kernel: usb-storage D 0040 0 1453 1 1472 1452 > (L-TLB) > kernel: c4316e00

Re: [PATCH][linux-usb-devel] Early USB handoff

2004-08-17 Thread Alan Stern
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Aleksey Gorelov wrote: > >> Here is slightly improved early USB legacy handoff patch for 2.4.27 > > > >The usual caveat is how we all wait for this to go into 2.6. > > Attached is a patch for 2.6.8.1 You could reorder and simplify slightly the code for handing off a UHCI c

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 2.6.8-rc2] usb hub docs and locktree()

2004-08-17 Thread David Brownell
On Monday 16 August 2004 9:56 am, Alan Stern wrote: > [Email can sometimes be a very frustrating medium. It's fair to say > that you and I are both very intelligent people, and yet we've been > talking past each other in this thread to an almost comical extent. I > bet we could have settled the w

[linux-usb-devel] Majordomo results: Re: important word document

2004-08-17 Thread Majordomo
-- This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Command 'this' not recognized. --=_NextPart_000_0016=_NextPart_000_0016 Command '--=_nextpart_000_0016=_nextpart_000_0016' not recognized. Content-Type: text/plain; Command 'content-type:' not recog

[linux-usb-devel] Rx throughput

2004-08-17 Thread Sebastian Haas
Hello, i'm currently developing an linux usb device driver. The drivers is done but i've some problems with my throughput while receiving data. I starting a bulk transfer and waiting for his completition and process the received data (in my read bulk callback). My transfer buffer can only store o