Hi,
The message you sent recently is being held because your address
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has not been verified.
To confirm that your message was not junk-mail, please reply to this
Email or send an empty message to this address:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You should only have to confirm your addres
Greg --
Here is an additional patch for pl2303 in 2.6.9-rc1,
to be applied after my previous circular buffer patch.
This patch waits for the buffer to drain on close and
then clears the buffer. In addition to the obvious
features, this also fixes a bug where closing a port
with a full buffer woul
Thanks for your great help!
I'll not use URB_ASYNC_UNLINK model and adde usb_get_dev in my prob func. and adde
usb_put_dev in my disconnect func. And send you the test result ASAP.
Regards,
Levis
-Original Message-
From: Pete Zaitcev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 200
On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 12:01:20 +0800
Xu Levis-Q16136 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The BUG is located in the function sohci_free_dev() of usb-ohci.c file.
> And from the comment "likely some interface's driver has a refcount bug"
> it seems a device refcount bug.
>[...]
> Could anybodies help me to w
I have developed usb host side driver for Intel's Xscale chip(PXA2xx). To processor
are connected by using usb transceiverless model. The issue is:
When the client is disconnected from the host, host side usb driver will come into a
kernel BUG and make a kernel panic. The BUG is located in the fu
Eric C. Cooper wrote:
I got the following message from kernel 2.6.8.1 when attaching a
portable hard disk (combo FireWire/USB 2) via USB:
usb 1-1.1: new full speed USB device using address 6
Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
usb-storage: This device (05ab,0060,1105 S 06 P 50) has unneeded
Sub
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, David Brownell wrote:
> > So all the
> > device sees is a port disable (no USB data sent -- I forget whether the
> > hub sets the data lines to SE0), followed shortly by a reset, followed by
> > re-enumeration.
>
> Well, re-enumeration in _some_ cases.
The logical-disconnec
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Mauro Ziliani wrote:
> Goodmorning.
> My name is Mauro Ziliani, is write from Parma, and I'm and computer science
> adviser.
> I'm apologize in advance for my english: sometimes is terrible.
> I hope to be clear in my questions.
>
> I'm in trouble because I don't understand
I got the following message from kernel 2.6.8.1 when attaching a
portable hard disk (combo FireWire/USB 2) via USB:
usb 1-1.1: new full speed USB device using address 6
Initializing USB Mass Storage driver...
usb-storage: This device (05ab,0060,1105 S 06 P 50) has unneeded
SubClass and Protocol en
Am Sonntag, 29. August 2004 19:11 schrieb Mauro Ziliani:
> Goodmorning.
> My name is Mauro Ziliani, is write from Parma, and I'm and computer science
> adviser.
> I'm apologize in advance for my english: sometimes is terrible.
> I hope to be clear in my questions.
>
> I'm in trouble because I do
On Sunday 29 August 2004 8:12 am, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, David Brownell wrote:
> ...
> > Clearly, a superset of "logical" disconnect.
>
> Yes, it wouldn't be a "logical" disconnect -- it would be a "real"
> disconnect so far as usbcore is concerned.
>
> > Speaking of which, how
On Saturday 28 August 2004 2:44 pm, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Aug 2004, David Brownell wrote:
>
> > > Exactly. Except that since _not_ setting the flag is the default,
> > > we need
> > > to keep it around until we can be sure that all the drivers have been
> > > converted to use usb_kill
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:42:24 +0100 Alan Cox wrote:
| On Sul, 2004-08-29 at 17:33, Nemosoft Unv. wrote:
| > That's one of the reasons I requested PWC to be removed. For me, it's also a
| > matter of quality: what good is a half-baked driver in the kernel when you
| > need to patch it first to get
Goodmorning.
My name is Mauro Ziliani, is write from Parma, and I'm and computer science
adviser.
I'm apologize in advance for my english: sometimes is terrible.
I hope to be clear in my questions.
I'm in trouble because I don't understand what happen with my driver and
ohci core.
I need to d
On Sul, 2004-08-29 at 17:33, Nemosoft Unv. wrote:
> That's one of the reasons I requested PWC to be removed. For me, it's also a
> matter of quality: what good is a half-baked driver in the kernel when you
> need to patch it first to get it working fully again? I don't want my name
> attached to
Hello,
On Sunday 29 August 2004 16:00, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Gwe, 2004-08-27 at 20:29, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > So stop whining about it. The driver got removed because the author
> > asked for it.
>
> Please put it back, minus the hooks so the rest of the world can use it.
No, don't! There is on
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, David Brownell wrote:
> I'm thinking these ganged switches are usually going to be UHCI
> root hubs (gangs of two ports!), though not always. I'm not sure
> ganged switching is allowed in external hubs any more; and at
> least on PCs, typical OHCI and EHCI configs use per-por
On Gwe, 2004-08-27 at 20:29, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So stop whining about it. The driver got removed because the author asked
> for it.
Please put it back, minus the hooks so the rest of the world can use it.
If not please remove every line of code I've even written because I
don't like the new
This got lost in my mailbox, sorry ...
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 10:22 am, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, David Brownell wrote:
>
> > When to power back up is an interesting issue, and it sounded
> > like you had a procedure in mind that could handle that well
> > in certain common ca
On Sad, 2004-08-28 at 00:13, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Keeping drivers against the wishes of the authors in the tree would
> be very troubling for the future. I can assure you that no maintainer
> will lightly pull a driver in this way.
Then the kernel community is no longer fit to use my code. So yo
On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Cyril Scetbon wrote:
> I would like to know what are the signs which force you to add an
> UNUSUAL_DEV entry in unusual_devs.h ?
In the most general terms, you add an new unusual_devs entry when that's
what the usb-storage driver needs to work with the device! :-)
More spe
Hi all.
(BI resolved compile eror by myseif.
(BBut It is unstable.
(BSometime captured,But sometime hung and reboot.
(BI don't know reason of this situation.
(Bhttp://www.geocities.jp/linux_on_tango/downloadfiles/old_kernel.html
(B
(BAdsynori
(B
(B
(B
(B
(B--
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 01:08:32PM +0200, Juergen Stuber wrote:
>> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> > [PATCH] USB: legousbtower.c module_param fix
>> >
>> > drivers/usb/misc/legousbtower.c: In function `__check_read_buffer_size':
>> > drivers/usb/mis
Alan Stern wrote:
So like I said, upgrade. If I recall correctly this problem was fixed
back around 2.6.6 or 2.6.7.
... and you're damn right :-) . I upgraded to kernel 2.6.8.1 and
everything is fine (except for supermount fs ;-) )
Thanks a lot.
Victor
---
Try CortiZyte!
With our pharmaceutical grade all-natural weight-loss
formula, you will:
- Lose pounds and inches like crazy
- Jump start your metabolism
- Boost your energy level
- Lose your appetite and feel satisfied
- Reduce cholesterol levels
- Eliminate cellulite and excess fat pockets
- Sti
Matthew Dharm wrote:
Search the linux-usb-devel archives for a patch entitled "help vendors
count to 1" -- that patch should help you. It's already been
submitted for
inclusion in the next kernel cycle.
thanks, it works great.
To avoid the search the patch is this one:
# This is a BitKeeper g
Hi all.
(BI want to run ISP1161 Tango version driver on linux-2.4.19.
(BBut I met eror as below.
(BHow do you escape this situation.
(B
(BIn file included from host/hc_isp116x.c:65:
(Bhost/hc_isp116x_rh.c:224: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
(Bhost/hc_isp116x_rh.c:224: dereferencing
28 matches
Mail list logo
