Am Montag, 5. Februar 2007 22:26 schrieb Joris van Rantwijk:
One more thing to bother you with ;-)
Since acm-throttle_lock is only used to protect the simple flag byte
acm-throttle, it is somewhat more efficient and convenient to use
an atomic_t instead of a spinlock.
Do you feel like
Add Teac HD-35PU devices to unusual_devs.h to fix I/O
errors resulting from wrong residue values returned
by the device.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Baechler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff -uprN a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h
b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h
--- a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h
On 5 feb 2007, at 23:07, Alan wrote:
atomic_t on many platforms isn't that efficient and there are more
cases
where the atomic bit operations are fast. How about using
test_bit/set_bit/clear_bit/etc
I don't know. The thing is, I want something different from atomicity.
In itself, atomically
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 10:38 schrieb Joris van Rantwijk:
On 5 feb 2007, at 23:07, Alan wrote:
atomic_t on many platforms isn't that efficient and there are more
cases
where the atomic bit operations are fast. How about using
test_bit/set_bit/clear_bit/etc
I don't know. The thing
From: Oliver Neukum
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.usb.devel
Subject: Re: CDC-ACM driver: data duplication due to throttling
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:38:09 +0100
Hallo.
To:
[]
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 10:38 schrieb Joris van Rantwijk:
On 5 feb 2007, at 23:07, Alan wrote:
atomic_t on many
On 6 feb 2007, at 11:38, Oliver Neukum wrote:
What I really want is ordered access and volatility. I want exactly
the
kind of semantics that Java defines for volatile variables.
A spinlock will surely do that. For the time being I'll push your first
three patches forward and we can discuss
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 12:31:14PM +0100, Joris van Rantwijk wrote:
[]
(In short, I really like Java.)
Then you mustn't do system level programming ;)
Do you happen to know what the exact semantics of 'volatile' are in C?
I'd love to know.
See subject and lkml archives.
Thanks,
Joris.
On 6 feb 2007, at 13:18, Oliver Neukum wrote:
And 'volatile' in C have nothing to do with hardware: SMP, caches or
whatever there may be.
The problem that we're trying to solve has not much to do with
hardware. I'd like to solve it at a pure logical level: by using some
interface that
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:18:13PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 12:31 schrieb Joris van Rantwijk:
A spinlock should certainly be sufficient. I think spinlocks have a
memory barrier built-in, otherwise they would be pretty useless.
They do, as do all locks.
Hm.
Hi,
this fixes the issue with output in the hid driver. I can now get keyboards
to sleep. It is still not perfect, but an important step. Comments?
Regards
Oliver
PS: against vanilla 2.6.20
--- linux-2.6.20/include/linux/hid.h2007-02-06 14:14:56.0 +0100
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 14:34 schrieb Oleg Verych:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:18:13PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 12:31 schrieb Joris van Rantwijk:
A spinlock should certainly be sufficient. I think spinlocks have a
memory barrier built-in, otherwise
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:32:44PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 14:34 schrieb Oleg Verych:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:18:13PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 12:31 schrieb Joris van Rantwijk:
A spinlock should certainly be sufficient.
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:32:44PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 14:34 schrieb Oleg Verych:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:18:13PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 12:31 schrieb Joris van Rantwijk:
LOM LOGISTICS INC (Other OTC: LOMJ at PK)
Last: $1.75
Momemtum: Buy very strong.
This one will rise like lastone. Look at news from the company.
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
this fixes the issue with output in the hid driver. I can now get
keyboards to sleep. It is still not perfect, but an important step.
Comments?
Hi Oliver,
I am going to look at it more thoroughly soon, just a quick note - when I
plug in the USB
The CP210x currently does a kcalloc() to create a temporary buffer
that has a maximum size of 16 bytes. This patch uses the stack for the
buffer.
This patch also simplifies the math used to calculate the number of
u32's needed to contain the byte array.
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardner [EMAIL
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Hi,
this fixes the issue with output in the hid driver. I can now get keyboards
to sleep. It is still not perfect, but an important step. Comments?
Regards
Oliver
PS: against vanilla 2.6.20
I'd really prefer to see
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Ben Gardner wrote:
The CP210x currently does a kcalloc() to create a temporary buffer
that has a maximum size of 16 bytes. This patch uses the stack for the
buffer.
This part of the patch is incorrect. The buffer must be allocated using
kmalloc or equivalent because some
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 16:15 schrieb Jiri Kosina:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
this fixes the issue with output in the hid driver. I can now get
keyboards to sleep. It is still not perfect, but an important step.
Comments?
Hi Oliver,
I am going to look at it more
Am Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 16:54 schrieb Alan Stern:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Hi,
this fixes the issue with output in the hid driver. I can now get keyboards
to sleep. It is still not perfect, but an important step. Comments?
Regards
Oliver
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
With this infrastructure in place, all you have to do is
set_bit(USB_DF_DEVICE_BUSY, hid_to_usb_dev(hid)-dflags);
whenever an event occurs. No messing around with extra timers.
If you make USB_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY a per interface variable,
Ah. That makes sense.
Thanks for the feedback.
Ben
On 2/6/07, Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Ben Gardner wrote:
The CP210x currently does a kcalloc() to create a temporary buffer
that has a maximum size of 16 bytes. This patch uses the stack for the
buffer.
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 7:57 am, Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Ben Gardner wrote:
The CP210x currently does a kcalloc() to create a temporary buffer
that has a maximum size of 16 bytes. This patch uses the stack for the
buffer.
This part of the patch is incorrect. The
On Monday 05 February 2007 10:34 pm, Guenther Sohler wrote:
What is the purpose of usbtest
http://www.linux-usb.org/usbtest
and how can I avoid loading it for my FX2 device ?
Don't configure it for your kernel ... it's only for
use by developers doing USB testing. Simple.
What is the
On Monday 05 February 2007 11:27 am, Alan Stern wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:20:52 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-usb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Linux-usb-users] ehci_hcd with slower FSB than normal
I have a pc that I use as
Hi,
Is there any way to debug the remote wakeup functionality of usb
devices? I'm trying to wake my MacMini up using the built-in IR
Receiver. This device is seen as an raw HID device.
Remote wakeup is working fine with other devices on this box. I can get
the box out of sleep using a Microsoft
On Friday 02 February 2007 19:05, you wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:32:24 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
usb: descriptor structures have to be packed
Many of the Wireless USB decriptors added to usb_ch9.h don't have the
__attribute__((packed)) tag, and thus, they
On Friday 02 February 2007 7:05 pm, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:32:24 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
usb: descriptor structures have to be packed
Many of the Wireless USB decriptors added to usb_ch9.h don't have the
__attribute__((packed)) tag, and
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 1:08 pm, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
On Friday 02 February 2007 19:05, you wrote:
The code should have used sizes such as
USB_DT_CONFIG_SIZE instead of sizeof().
I have a problem with that, and is maintenance. Is not that I don't like
DT_CONFIG_SIZE at all
Le mardi 06 février 2007 à 13:43 -0800, David Brownell a écrit :
Remote wakeup is working fine with other devices on this box. ...
But this doesn't work when I try it on the IR receiver although it
exposes the remote wakeup capability.
Do you know for a fact that it has _working_
The Coverity checker noted the following inconsequent NULL checking in
drivers/usb/serial/mos7720.c:
-- snip --
...
static void mos7720_close(struct usb_serial_port *port, struct file *filp)
{
...
/* While closing port, shutdown all bulk read, write *
* and interrupt read
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:08:19 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[btw, I truly have little idea about which are those specific costs,
out of professional curiosity, got any pointers?]
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 2:48 pm, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:08:19 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[btw, I truly have little idea about which are those specific costs,
out of professional curiosity, got any pointers?]
全国首创
不会被抛弃的传单，效益永久的广告
企业为了宣传产品，或为了提高企业在本地的知名度，往往印制精美的传单向大众发放。拿到传单者，只有少数会看看，大多数会选择扔掉。广告效果很不理想。
我们可为企业提供一个好的方案：将收藏品融入广告传单中，使广告传单具有收藏价值和增值功能，人们肯定不会再扔掉。什么时候欣赏藏品时都能看到广告，效果不言而喻。使您的企业传单变成一份永久广告！
From: David Brownell
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.usb.devel
Subject: Re: PATCH: usb: descriptor structures have to be packed
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 16:02:27 -0800
Hallo.
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 2:48 pm, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:08:19 -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez [EMAIL
On Tuesday 06 February 2007 5:58 pm, Oleg Verych wrote:
Would you clarify non aligned access issue on well known platforms
(*x86-*). I see on gcc's output, that they are not carry much about it:
X86 has hardware logic to handle misaligned access directly.
Which is why GCC output doesn't pay
Hi All,
We have written usb host controller driver for our arm board which
does not have any pci interface.We are trying to test the this usb
host controller with the usb test driver provided in the linux
kernel.We tried to test the host controller with an mass storage
device but it is giving
37 matches
Mail list logo
