Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Active Huawei E220 devs

2007-07-03 Thread linlei 60022748
Hello Greg, Will you accept it? best wishes Linlei Huawei Technologies Wireless Terminal R&D Dept - 原邮件 - 发件人: linlei 60022748 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 日期: 星期二, 六月 26日, 2007 下午4:06 主题: Re: [linux-usb-devel][PATCH] Active Huawei E220 devs > Phil, > Thank you for accept th

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Active Huawei E220 devs

2007-06-26 Thread linlei 60022748
"HUAWEI", - "E220 USB-UMTS Install", - US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, - US_FL_IGNORE_DEVICE), + "HUAWEI MOBILE Mass Storage", + US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, usb_stor_switch_ports_init, + 0), /* Reported

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH] Active Huawei E220 devs

2007-06-25 Thread linlei 60022748
Hi there, This patch make the HUAWEI E220 device to map out three ports instead of only one virtural cd port. See the patch for the full explanation, CC's, and sign-off. And please apply. best regards Linlei Huawei Technologies Wireless Terminal R&D Dept activate_huawei_dev.patch Description

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH pd54] Remove Huawei unusual_devs entry

2007-04-22 Thread linlei 60022748
o need the userspace code to support for old kernels. Can you help us to achieve that or give us some advice? - 原邮件 - 发件人: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 日期: 星期日, 四月 22日, 2007 上午0:20 主题: Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH pd54] Remove Huawei unusual_devs entry > On Thursday 19

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH pd54] Remove Huawei unusual_devs entry

2007-04-19 Thread linlei 60022748
Hi everyone, We consider it's not the appropriate status of E220 which has no CD-ROM. In MS-Windows, while plug the device into PC with the driver already installed, the OS will send a SET_FEATURE command to it. Then our device receives the signal and switchs from one CD-ROM to one CD-ROM + two

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Issue of HUAWEI E220 On Linux

2007-04-12 Thread linlei 60022748
Phil Dibowitz wrote: >The patch was originally accepted (on December 2006) because it was the only >way to get the modem side of the device to work. > >See the first 4 emails in this thread: > http://marc.info/?t=11638716161&r=1&w=2 > >Then, in March, Rui Santos wrote to say this patch should