Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 270952c..d46c083 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4705,6 +4705,7 @@ M:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L:
On Sunday 12 August 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seem to be missing some context for these 2many patches; and
don't really see any in the MARC archives either. This seems like
about 600 patches out of the
David Brownell wrote:
Is there general agreement that these F: entries should be used?
Rather than, say, embedding references in the relevant parts of
the source tree, adjacent to those files, where they would be more
visible to people making relevant changes.
I'm also concerned with the
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007, David Brownell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm also concerned with the reality that the MAINTAINERS file is
not accurate. The $SUBJECT patch is one example; the named maintainer
is no longer active (in that area, at least) and the named driver is
not actually separable from
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 08:36 -0700, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
Completely agreed. The hub driver entry should be removed. The hub
driver is part of the USB core and should be maintained as such.
Removed
-
This SF.net email is
