On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Kyle Harris wrote:
> I'll use your patch as a foundation and then resubmit.
>
> Thanks, Kyle.
Did you see this message in linux-usb-users today?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-users&m=109595162714236&w=2
There's a good chance that MS style enumeration would fix
On Thursday 23 September 2004 11:08 am, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Kyle Harris wrote:
>
> Below is a patch I worked out a month or two ago. It may be slightly
> stale now, and it probably could use a little improvement, but take a
> look.
>
I'll use your patch as a foundation and t
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Kyle Harris wrote:
> This is against 2.6.8.1
>
> Changes -
>
> Change the way that a device is enumerated since some devices fail if the
> initial get_device_descriptor does not request the actual descriptor length.
I don't like many of the details in your patch:
It unco
On Wednesday 22 September 2004 09:36 pm, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:49:40 -0400
>
> Kyle Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > @@ -1811,8 +1850,10 @@
> >
> > ret = hub_port_status(hdev, i,
> > &portstatus, &portchange
On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 20:49:40 -0400
Kyle Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @@ -1811,8 +1850,10 @@
>
> ret = hub_port_status(hdev, i,
> &portstatus, &portchange);
> + printk("i %d s %x c %x r %d\n", i, portstatu
This is against 2.6.8.1
Changes -
Change the way that a device is enumerated since some devices fail if the
initial get_device_descriptor does not request the actual descriptor length.
diff -X dontdiff -NurbB linux-2.6.8.orig/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
linux/drivers/usb/core/hub.c
--- linux-2.6.8
