I'm cc-ing this back to the list, in case Greg or others want to comment.
Let's keep this open from now on.
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:31:57 +0200, Paolo Abeni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 22:48 -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > By the way, there is no patch yet, but I blogged a s
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:57:45 +0200, Paolo Abeni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the patch I see these main issues: object layout, and API design.
The rest is minor. I am going to use most of the patch and fix it up.
Unfortunately, it's not going to be binary compatible with your API.
* Objects are
Hi Pete,
> > Would relayfs be a better choice than debugfs for exporting potentially
> > large quantities of binary data?
>
> I'm sick of mounting them, so for the binary API I was going to
> create a bunch of character devices with a dynamic major.
> With udev, I do not even need to read /proc/d
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 10:17:52 +0200, Duncan Sands <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, any reason why CONFIG_USB_MON doesn't select CONFIG_DEBUG_FS?
> Is usbmon useful without debugfs?
It's not now, but it will be once I and Paolo are done here.
-- Pete
--
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 22:43, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:44:43 +, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does it mean text interface is now deprecated? Or perhaps ioctl should
> > be added to text interface too? Or maybe we do not need binary
> > interface if we
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 16:51:09 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would relayfs be a better choice than debugfs for exporting potentially
> large quantities of binary data?
I'm sick of mounting them, so for the binary API I was going to
create a bunch of character devices with a d
On Wed, Oct 11, 2006 at 04:51:09PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:44:43 +, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Does it mean text interface is now deprecated? Or perhaps ioctl should
> > > be added to text interfac
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:44:43 +, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does it mean text interface is now deprecated? Or perhaps ioctl should
> > be added to text interface too? Or maybe we do not need binary
> > interface if we allow resizing
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006 19:44:43 +, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it mean text interface is now deprecated? Or perhaps ioctl should
> be added to text interface too? Or maybe we do not need binary
> interface if we allow resizing on text interface?
I haven't reviewed Paolo's patc
Hi!
> From: Paolo Abeni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> A binary interface is added to usbmon. For each USB bus present on the host
> system a new file is added to the debugfs directory, in the form "usb%db".
>
> USB records are stored in a liked list, alike current text interface
> implementation, so
On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> From: Paolo Abeni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> A binary interface is added to usbmon. For each USB bus present on the host
> system a new file is added to the debugfs directory, in the form "usb%db".
>
> USB records are stored in a liked list, alike current
From: Paolo Abeni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A binary interface is added to usbmon. For each USB bus present on the host
system a new file is added to the debugfs directory, in the form "usb%db".
USB records are stored in a liked list, alike current text interface
implementation, so most code is share
12 matches
Mail list logo
