On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > I'm beginning to agree with Matthew Garrett that autosuspend should be
> > disabled by default except for known-good devices and device classes...
>
> We could simply revert to enabling autosuspend only for those devices
> whose driver requests it. M
Am Sonntag 12 August 2007 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > Oliver and Pete:
> > >
> > > Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries
> > > for scanners with a single class-wide entr
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > Oliver and Pete:
> >
> > Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries
> > for scanners with a single class-wide entry?
>
> Which class? It would have to blanket all vendor spe
Am Donnerstag 09 August 2007 schrieb Alan Stern:
> Oliver and Pete:
>
> Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries
> for scanners with a single class-wide entry?
Which class? It would have to blanket all vendor specific devices.
This is a rather broad swipe.
> What abou
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Sam Liddicott wrote:
> From: "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 10/08/07 04:30
>
> =There's no way we could ever get a list of all good or all bad printers,
> =so no matter what we do, we'd miss some :(
>
> But better to miss suspend on some than miss working altogether o
-Original Message-
From: "Greg KH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 10/08/07 04:30
=There's no way we could ever get a list of all good or all bad printers,
=so no matter what we do, we'd miss some :(
But better to miss suspend on some than miss working altogether on others
surely?
I never h
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:23:11PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Oliver and Pete:
>
> Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries
> for scanners with a single class-wide entry?
>
> What about printers?
My printer suspends just fine, so I don't want to do that for all
printe
Stern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Oliver Neukum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Pete Zaitcev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Matthew Garrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "USB development list"
Sent: 09/08/07 20:23
Subject: [linux-usb-devel] Disabl
Oliver and Pete:
Is it possible to replace all those USB_QUIRK_NO_AUTOSUSPEND entries
for scanners with a single class-wide entry?
What about printers?
Would a USB_QUIRK_RESET_RESUME entry suffice or do we really need
NO_AUTOSUSPEND?
If these devices really can't handle being suspended then it
