Hi,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 04:18:45PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 03:39:38PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the pointer. Now that SANE 1.0.9 has been released, are
> > > there any objections to me removing the scanner driver in 2.5?
> >
> > Users
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 03:39:38PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the pointer. Now that SANE 1.0.9 has been released, are
> > there any objections to me removing the scanner driver in 2.5?
>
> Users who currently use sane 1.0.9 and the development kernels, and
> have Epso
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 11:58:00PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:49:12PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There was a question about if the generic USB scanner driver should go
> > away in future and if the user-space tools can cope with this.
> >
> >
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:49:12PM +0100, Henning Meier-Geinitz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There was a question about if the generic USB scanner driver should go
> away in future and if the user-space tools can cope with this.
>
> I guess the main users of the generic driver are SANE and Vuescan. I
> can't
Hi,
There was a question about if the generic USB scanner driver should go
away in future and if the user-space tools can cope with this.
I guess the main users of the generic driver are SANE and Vuescan. I
can't speak for Vuescan but it is reported to use the generic scanner
driver currently.
I
