Re: [linux-usb-devel] OHCI problem with Interrupt URBs

2001-06-26 Thread David Brownell
> > I'd not attempt such tricks outside the completion handler, though. > > And it shouldn't really be necessary, either. ISO will have the same > > issue; in both cases, a fix seems like it'd need to formally introduce > > Why? An ISO URB is in progress or done when its completion is called. >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] OHCI problem with Interrupt URBs

2001-06-23 Thread Georg Acher
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 06:43:33AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > I'd not attempt such tricks outside the completion handler, though. > And it shouldn't really be necessary, either. ISO will have the same > issue; in both cases, a fix seems like it'd need to formally introduce Why? An ISO URB

Re: [linux-usb-devel] OHCI problem with Interrupt URBs

2001-06-23 Thread David Brownell
> The OHCI driver only seems to want to actively unlink an URB if it's > status is -EINPROGRESS. The status of an interrupt URB in the completion > handler is 0. I've managed to get the USB sub-system to unlink the URB by > setting status to -EINPROGRESS. I know this is naughty but so far I > h

Re: [linux-usb-devel] OHCI problem with Interrupt URBs

2001-06-22 Thread Pete Zaitcev
> From: Michael Bosland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:03:01 -0700 (PDT) > The OHCI driver only seems to want to actively unlink an URB if it's > status is -EINPROGRESS. The status of an interrupt URB in the completion > handler is 0. I've managed to get

[linux-usb-devel] OHCI problem with Interrupt URBs

2001-06-22 Thread Michael Bosland
Hi, I'm still working on Interrupt Out communications. I think I may have found a work around for my problem. The OHCI driver only seems to want to actively unlink an URB if it's status is -EINPROGRESS. The status of an interrupt URB in the completion handler is 0. I've managed to get the USB