Re: [linux-usb-devel] Patch to drivers/usb/printer.c

2001-04-09 Thread Stephen J. Gowdy
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, David Brownell wrote: > No problem, but please avoid "bcc to list" ... it's just confusing! and it also means the post is held on the server till it is approved. -- /--+-=-=-=-=-+-\ |Stephen J. Gowdy |A4000/

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Patch to drivers/usb/printer.c

2001-04-09 Thread David Brownell
t's OK for write() to return an error! > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Pete Zaitcev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: &

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Patch to drivers/usb/printer.c

2001-04-09 Thread Pete Zaitcev
Zaitcev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, April 07, 2001 9:11 PM > Subject: [linux-usb-devel] Patch to drivers/usb/prin

[linux-usb-devel] Patch to drivers/usb/printer.c

2001-04-07 Thread Pete Zaitcev
I got assigned a bug report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34551 Basically, when user's process loops it does not allow khubd to run. I found that write() never returns an error, and did not know if it was safe to change that behaviour. So, here it is, the best band-aid I c