Dave:
Thanks a lot: )
Ethan.
From: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ethan Du" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Questions on CDC EEM
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 07:18:14 -0700
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 7
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 7:01 am, Ethan Du wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you mean EEM is saving endpoints?
> >
> >No; as I said, it's less demanding because it doesn't need altsettings.
>
> I know the Data Class interface of a networking device shall have a minimum
> of two interface settings. Do you m
Dave:
Thanks a lot for all your explanation. But I still have some questions.
On Monday 03 April 2006 5:32 am, Ethan Du wrote:
>
> > > The only difference is ECM extended a data class
> > > interface. EEM doesn't. Is this the benefit of EEM? And is it more
> > > efficient using less int
On Monday 03 April 2006 5:32 am, Ethan Du wrote:
>
> > > The only difference is ECM extended a data class
> > > interface. EEM doesn't. Is this the benefit of EEM? And is it more
> > > efficient using less interfaces?
> >
> >If you look at EEM, it's clearly a bit less demanding than ECM in terms
From: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
CC: "Ethan Du" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Questions on CDC EEM
Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2006 07:56:54 -0800
On Sunday 02 April 2006 1:05 am, Ethan Du wrote:
>
> I
On Sunday 02 April 2006 1:05 am, Ethan Du wrote:
>
> I am currently working on CDC EEM. I would like to implement a CDC EEM
> device. But I feel confused about CDC ECM and CDC EEM. As I see, both are
> implemented by writing a pseudo network adapter driver for both the host
> side and device s
Hi, all:
I am currently working on CDC EEM. I would like to implement a CDC EEM
device. But I feel confused about CDC ECM and CDC EEM. As I see, both are
implemented by writing a pseudo network adapter driver for both the host
side and device side. The only difference is ECM extended a data cl
